Tıp Fakültesi / Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1403

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Item
    Evaluation of Interobserver and Intraobserver Differences of Graf Method in Developmental Hip Dysplasia
    (2023) Dogruel, Halil; Baymurat, Alim Can; Tuncay, Ismail Cengiz; Atalar, Hakan
    Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate possible differences in hip ultrasonography (US) results between physicians working in different medical centers. Method: In this study, a total of 117 horizontal US images representing all sonographic types of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) were utilized. Four experienced researchers independently measured the 117 US images at different times. The results obtained by each researcher were documented separately, including alpha and beta angles, Graf types. All of the collected data were analyzed statistically to assess for interobserver and intraobserver variability. Results: The study found that the average change between the alpha angles ranged from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 4. The mean change between the beta angles was wider, ranging from a minimum of 1.8 to a maximum of 8.2. To evaluate the differences between the Graf hip typologies, paired groups were formed and Cohen's Kappa method was used. For the first group k= 0.661, for the second group k= 0.671, for the third group K= 0.647, for the fourth group k= 0, 718, k= 0.717 for the fifth group and k= 0.637 for the sixth group. Interobserver Kappa evaluation results (k=0.647) showed moderate and significant agreement. Conclusion: The results revealed a moderate to substantial level of agreement between the researchers. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the use of US for screening and follow-up of the Graf hip typing method should be performed by experienced professionals.
  • Item
    Analysis of Risk Factors for Ultrasonographic Graf Type IIa (-) Hips in Developmental Dysplasia: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study with Follow-Up Outcomes
    (2021) Haberal, Bahtiyar; Sahin, Orcun; Tuncay, Ismail Cengiz; 0000-0002-1668-6997; 0000-0002-6035-6258; W-9080-2019; AAF-4032-2021
    Objective: To examine the association of Graf type IIa(-) hips with maternal and infant risk factors in newborns and to evaluate the follow-up outcomes. Materials and Methods: Two different risk analyses were performed. In the first analysis, Graf type I hips were grouped as "controls," and Graf type II were grouped as "cases." In the second analysis, all the Graf type I and Type IIa(+) hips were grouped as "controls," and all Graf type IIa (-) hips were considered as "cases." Maternal age, presence of consanguinity, pregnancy, and smoking were considered as maternal risk factors. Sex, birth weight, gestational age, associated congenital anomalies, and family history were considered as infant risk factors. Further, we determined the risk factors for Graf type IIa and type IIa (-) hips. Results: The study population included 73 cases (11.4%) and 569 controls (88.6%), including 322 (50.2%) male and 320 (49.8%) female infants. Graf type IIa hips revealed significant differences for gestational age (>42 wk), birthweight (>3500 g), and maternal age (<= 20 y). At follow-up, all Graf type IIa(+) hips became Graf type I mature hips. In contrast, three Graf type IIa(-) hips (3/12, 25%) required additional treatment. Conclusion: Significant risk factors for Graf type IIa(-) hips were female sex, gestational age of >42 wk, and birthweight of >3500 g. Almost one-quarter of Graf type IIa (-) hips may require additional treatment. Thus, significant risk factors for Graf type IIa(-)should be remembered in clinical practice.
  • Item
    Diagnostic value of shear wave velocity in polycystic ovarian syndrome
    (2021) Gursu, Turkan; Cevik, Halime; Desteli, Guldeniz Aksan; Yilmaz, Birnur; Bildacı, Tevfik Berk; Eraslan, Alper; 34970437
    Aim: In polycystic ovarian syndrome, the ovaries become stiffer due to chronic anovulation. We aimed to compare tissue elasticity in terms of shear wave velocities measured using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging technique between the ovaries of polycystic ovarian syndrome women and non-polycystic ovarian syndrome women. Material and methods: The study was designed as a retrospective data analysis of women who underwent transvaginal ultrasound and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in a university hospital between July 2014 and March 2015, for various reasons. There were 32 polycystic ovarian syndrome patients and 32 patients without a diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Age, body mass index, fasting glucose levels, cycle day 3 follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, prolactin, antimullerian hormone levels, and menstrual patterns with clinical hyperandrogenism were evaluated. On the menstrual cycle days 2-4, by performing a transvaginal ultrasound scan, the ovarian volumes and antral follicle counts in both ovaries were recorded for each woman. The ultrasound system was converted into the elastography mode, and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging was performed. Shear wave velocity (m/sec) was measured at least 5 times for each ovary, and the mean value was calculated for each polycystic ovarian syndrome and non-polycystic ovarian syndrome woman. Results: Age, body mass index, fasting glucose levels, cycle day 3 follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, and prolactin levels were similar between the groups (p 0,05). Antimullerian hormone levels, antral follicle counts, and mean ovarian volumes were statistically different between the groups (p <0,05). Mean shear wave velocity values for both ovaries were 2.12 +/- 0.82 (0.78-4.9) m/sec in the polycystic ovarian syndrome group, and 1.18 +/- 0.41 (0.77-2.0) m/sec in the non-polycystic ovarian syndrome group, which was statistically significantly different (p = 0.016). Conclusion: In our study, we found significantly higher shear wave velocity levels in polycystic ovarian syndrome women than non-polycystic ovarian syndrome women, which indicates an impact of the condition on shear wave velocity. The increased acoustic frequencies cause a decreased response in time to transition, and motion becomes out of phase; in other words, scattered waves are faster in stiffer ovaries. Our results are thus compatible with the pathophysiology of the disease. Shear wave velocity is a beneficial tool for evaluating ovarian elasticity in polycystic ovarian syndrome patients in whom the levels are found to be significantly higher than non-polycystic ovarian syndrome women. In light of these findings, shear wave velocity is expected to be slower than polycystic ovarian syndrome levels in ovulatory women.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Risk for Malignant and Borderline Ovarian Neoplasms Following Basic Preoperative Evaluation by Ultrasonography, Ca125 Level and Age
    (2014) Karadag, Burak; Kocak, M.; Kayikcioglu, F.; Ercan, F.; Dilbaz, B.; Kose, M.F.; Haberal, A.; 25339052
    Objective: To verify the basic preoperative evaluation in the discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in our clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Data were collected on the records of 636 women with adnexal masses who had undergone surgery either by open or endoscopic approaches. Those with obvious signs of malignancy, any history of cancer, emergency surgeries without basic evaluation were excluded. The preoperative features by age, ultrasound and serum Ca125 level were compared with final histopathological diagnosis at the four departments of the institution. These are the general gynecology (Group 1:exploratory laparotomy), the gynecologic endoscopy (Group 2: laparoscopy and adnexectomy), the gynecological oncology (Group 3:staging laparotomy) and the gynecologic endocrinology and infertility (Group 4: laparoscopy and cystectomy). Results: There were simple and complex cyst rates of 22.3% and 77.2%, respectively. There were 86.3% benign, 4.1% (n:20) borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) and 6.4% (n:48) malignant lesions. There were 3 BOT and 9 ovarian cancers in Group 1 and one BOT and two ovarian cancer in the Group 2. During the surgery, 15 BOT (75%) and 37 ovarian cancer (77%) were detected in the Group 3, only one BOT was encountered in the Group 4. The risk of rate of unsuspected borderline or focally invasive ovarian cancer significantly increased by age, size, complex morphology and Ca125 (95% CI, OR=2.72, OR=6.60, OR=6.66 and OR=4.69, respectively). Conclusions: Basic preoperative evaluation by comprehensive ultrasound imaging combined with age and Ca125 level has proved highly accurate for prediction of unexpected malignancies. Neither novel markers nor new imaging techniques provide better information that allow clinicians to assess the feasibility of the planned surgery; consequently, the risk of inadvertent cyst rupture during laparoscopy may be significantly decreased in selected cases.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Analysis of the effectiveness of ultrasound and clinical examination methods in fetal weight estimation for term pregnancies
    (2015) Zahran, Mehmet; Tohma, Yusuf Aytac; Erkaya, Salim; Evliyaoglu, Ozlem; Colak, Eser; Coskun, Bora; 28913073
    Objective: To compare the accuracy of clinical and ultrasonographic (USG) estimation of fetal weight in non-complicated, term pregnancies. Materials and Methods: Two hundred term pregnant women were included in the study. We used three formulae for the estimation of fetal weight at term; the Hadlock formula for the USG method, and two different formulas for clinical methods, maternal symphysis-fundal height and abdominal circumference at the level of umbilicus. Accuracy was determined by mean percentage error, mean absolute percentage error and proportion of estimates within 10% of actual birth weight (birth weight +/- 10%). Patients were divided into two groups according to actual birth weight, the normal birth weight group (2500-3999 g) and high birth weight group (>= 4000 g). Results: All three methods statistically overestimated birth weight for the high and normal birth weight groups (p<0.001, p=1.000, p=0.233) (p=0.037, p<0.001, and p<0.001). For both groups, the mean absolute percentage errors of USG were smaller than for the other two clinical methods and the number of estimates were within 10% of actual birth weight for USG was greater than for the clinical methods; the differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). No statistically significant difference of accuracy was observed for all three methods for the high birth weight group (p=0.365, p=0.768, and p=0.540). However, USG systematically underestimated birth weight in this group. Conclusion: For estimation of fetal birth weight in term pregnancies, ultrasonography is better than clinical methods. In the suspicion of macrosomia, it must be remembered that no method is better than any other. In addition, if ultrasonography is used, careful management is recommended because ultrasonography overestimates in this group.