Tıp Fakültesi / Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1403

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    Cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults (MIS-A) Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection
    (2022) Demiroglu, Yusuf Ziya; Oruc, Ebru; Odemis, Ilker; Bilgel, Ziya Gokalp; 0000-0003-2638-0163; AAD-1638-2019
    Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A) is a rare condition that develops after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We present two young adult male patients, aged 25 and 24 years, who admitted to our outpatient clinic with high fever, redness in the eyes, diarrhea, and maculopapular rash four weeks after after clinically mild COVID-19 infection. Echocardiography showed global hypokinesia in both cases. Therefore, the history of COVID-19 should be questioned, and the patient should be evaluated for possible MIS-A, especially when new heart failure is detected during the pandemic.
  • Item
    Daptomycin Vs. Glycopeptides in The Treatment of Febrile Neutropenia: Results of The Izmir Matched Cohort Study
    (2019) Sipahi, Oguz Resat; Kahraman, Hasip; Erdem, Huseyin Aytac; Yetkin, Funda; Kaya, Selcuk; Demirdal, Tuna; Tunccan, Ozlem Guzel; Karasahin, Omer; Oruc, Ebru; Cag, Yasemin; Kurtaran, Behice; Ulug, Mehmet; Kutlu, Murat; Avci, Meltem; Oztoprak, Nefise; Arda, Bilgin; Pullukcu, Husnu; Tasbakan, Meltem; Yamazhan, Tansu; Kandemir, Ozlem; Dizbay, Murat; Sipahi, Hilal; Ulusoy, Sercan; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7956-7306; 30498901; GVT-0626-2022
    PurposeIn this multicentre, retrospective, matched cohort study we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of neutropenic fever cases that were treated with daptomycin or a glycopeptide (vancomycin or teicoplanin).MethodsData and outcomes of adult (aged>18-years old) patients with neutropenic fever [(1) without clinical and radiological evidence of pneumonia, (2) who were treated with daptomycin or a glycopeptide (teicoplanin or vancomycin) for any reason and for at least 72 h] were extracted from the hospital databases. Matching was performed with all of the three following criteria: (1) underlying disease, (2) reason for starting daptomycin or glycopeptide (microbiologic evidence vs. microbiologic evidence, clinical infection vs. clinical infection and empirical therapy vs. empirical therapy) and (3) neutropenic status.ResultsOverall 128 patients [(69/123) (56.1%) in the daptomycin cohort (D) and 59/123 (48%) in the glycopeptide cohort (G)] had a resolution of fever at the end of 72h antibiotic treatment (p=0.25). There was no significant difference in cured, improved and (cured+improved) rates between (D) and (G) cohorts as well as fever of unknown origin cases or microbiologically confirmed infections or clinically defined infections subgroups (p>0.05). There was also no significant difference (p>0.05), in terms of persistent response in the (D) versus (G) cohorts,ConclusionsThese findings suggest that although not better, daptomycin efficacy is comparable to vancomycin if used as empiric therapy in the treatment of adult febrile neutropenia. We conclude that daptomycin may be used at least as a salvage therapy alternative to glycopeptides in the treatment of adult febrile neutropenia cases. A large, randomized-controlled trial may further consolidate the evidence related to this question.
  • Item
    Pneumococcal and Influenza Vaccines in Dialysis Patients: Vaccination Information, Rates, and Patient Awareness
    (2022) Kara, Sibel; Torun, Dilek; Oruc, Ebru; Habesoglu, Mehmet Ali; Akcay, Muserref Sule; GVT-0626-2022
    Objective: Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rates are still far below the desired levels in dialysis patients. We aimed to determine the pneumococcal and influenza vaccination information, rates, and knowledge levels of dialysis patients. Methods: The study is a descriptive cross-sectional study in which 307 dialysis patients between 2020 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics of all patients and vaccination information were obtained from the face-to-face questionnaire and hospital medical records. Results: Of the participants, 52.4% were males, and the mean age was 56 +/- 15.45 years. The pneumococcal vaccination rate was 37.1%, and the influenza vaccination rate was 58.6%. Of 114 patients who had received a pneumococcal vaccine, 91.2% had received a single dose of the vaccine. While the type of vaccine could not be determined in 86.8% of the patients in this group, the rate of vaccination with the 2 types of the pneumococcal vaccine was only 8.8%. Annual vaccination was given to all those who were vaccinated against influenza. In the whole group, the rate of those who had never heard of the pneumococcal vaccine was 24.4%, while this rate was 6.5% for the influenza vaccine. The patients had a very low level of knowledge of both vaccines (41% and 53.7%, respectively). Conclusion: Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rate of dialysis patients was low. Influenza vaccination had been performed in compliance with the recommended scheme, but the doses of the pneumococcal vaccine were incomplete. Although the level of patient knowledge was low for both vaccines, patients were more aware of the influenza vaccine.