Tıp Fakültesi / Faculty of Medicine
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1403
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Diagnosis and Treatment of Takayasu Arteritis in Turkey: A Single Center Results(2015) Akay, Tankut; Harman, Ali; Yucel, Eftal; Ozyer, Umut; Gultekin, Bahadir; 0000-0002-4300-009X; 0000-0002-7386-7110; AAK-9071-2021; ABA-7388-2021; K-9824-2013Background: This study aims to evaluate clinical, laboratory, and radiological features as well as the surgical and endovascular procedure outcomes of patients with Takayasu arteritis in our hospital. Methods: Hospital records of 38 patients who were followed with the diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis between April 2002 and January 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. Records included the clinical history of Takayasu arteritis, comorbid diseases, laboratory and angiographic findings at the time of diagnosis, and mode of treatment. Results: The female/male ratio was 3.75:1. According to angiographic classification; 11 patients were type 1, three patients were type 2a, three patients were type 2b, four patients were type 3, six patients were type 4, and 11 patients were type 5. Eighteen of 38 patients were administered endovascular or surgical intervention (8 surgeries and 10 endovascular procedures). There was no early mortality. Conclusion: Demographic and angiographic features of our patients were similar to those of Japan and Mediterranean populations. The long-term follow-up of endovascular procedure success, and the management of restenosis may be among challenges to be faced in the future. Bypass surgery remains the gold standard for achieving long-term patency. Endovascular treatment may provide short-term symptom relief in patients who are not suitable for surgical treatment.Item Emergency Cholecystectomy vs Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Plus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Patients with Acute Cholecystitis(2014) Karakayali, Feza Y.; Akdur, Aydincan; Kirnap, Mahir; Harman, Ali; Ekici, Yahya; Moray, Gokhan; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1874-947X; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8726-3369; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7386-7110; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-7287; 24919616; AAB-3888-2021; AAA-3068-2021; AAH-9198-2019; K-9824-2013; AAE-1041-2021BACKGROUND: In low-risk patients with acute cholecystitis who did not respond to nonoperative treatment, we prospectively compared treatment with emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy or percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy followed by delayed cholecystectomy. METHODS: In 91 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I or II) who had symptoms of acute cholecystitis 272 hours at hospital admission and who did not respond to nonoperative treatment (48 hours), 48 patients were treated with emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 43 patients were treated with delayed cholecystectomy at 24 weeks after insertion of a percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy catheter. After initial treatment, the patients were followed up for 23 months on average (range 7-29). RESULT: Compared with the patients who had emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the patients who were treated with percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy and delayed cholecystectomy had a lower frequency of conversion to open surgery [19(40%) vs 8(19%); P=0.029], a frequency of intraoperative bleeding >= 100 mL [16(33%) vs 4(9%); P=0.006], a mean postoperative hospital stay (5.3 +/- 3.3 vs 3.0 +/- 2.4 days; P=0.001), and a frequency of complications [17(35%) vs 4(9%); P=0.003]. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute cholecystitis who presented to the hospital 272 hours after symptom onset and did not respond to nonoperative treatment for 48 hours, percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy produced better outcomes and fewer complications than emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy.