Tıp Fakültesi / Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1403

Browse

Filters

2021 - 20232

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Haberal, BahtiyarSubject: search.filters.subject.ultrasonography

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Use of Generalizability Theory Evaluating Comparative Reliability of the Scapholunate Interval Measurement With X-ray, CT, and US
    (2023) Kuru, Cigdem Ayhan; Sezer, Rahime; Cetin, Can; Haberal, Bahtiyar; Yakut, Yavuz; Kuru, Ilhami; 0000-0003-3173-1757; 0000-0003-4613-1607; 0000-0002-1668-6997; 36604227; W-9080-2019
    Rationale and Objectives: There is no universally accepted standard technique for measuring the scapholunate interval and no specific sources of measurement error have been identified. We aimed to establish a set of normal radiological criteria for the scapholunate interval that could be used in comparative studies of wrist pathology to determine interobserver reliability and to identify potential errors that might influence measurements.Materials and Methods: A total of 60 healthy volunteers participated in the study. Scapholunate interval was measured by three independent observers using X-ray, CT, and US in four positions, including neutral, fist, radial and ulnar deviation. Inter-observer reliability was tested using intraclass correlation coefficient. Generalizability theory was applied to evaluate specific sources of measurement error related to participant, observer, imaging modality and measurement position.Results: In neutral position, the scapholunate interval measured by X-ray, CT, and US was 3.1 mm, 3.5 mm and 3.5 mm respectively. The interval remained constant during fist and radial deviation but decreased during ulnar deviation. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.874 to 0.907 for X-ray, 0.773-0.881 for CT and 0.964-0.979 for US. In the generalizability study, the participant x modality x position interaction accounted for the largest proportion of total variance (29%).Conclusion: X-ray, CT, and US are reliable modalities for measuring the scapholunate interval, with US having the highest reliability. Participant and position factors may independently contribute to measurement error. Therefore, standardized measurement positions are recommended to obtain reliable measurement results.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Analysis of Risk Factors for Ultrasonographic Graf Type IIa (-) Hips in Developmental Dysplasia: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study with Follow-Up Outcomes
    (2021) Haberal, Bahtiyar; Sahin, Orcun; Tuncay, Ismail Cengiz; 0000-0002-1668-6997; 0000-0002-6035-6258; W-9080-2019; AAF-4032-2021
    Objective: To examine the association of Graf type IIa(-) hips with maternal and infant risk factors in newborns and to evaluate the follow-up outcomes. Materials and Methods: Two different risk analyses were performed. In the first analysis, Graf type I hips were grouped as "controls," and Graf type II were grouped as "cases." In the second analysis, all the Graf type I and Type IIa(+) hips were grouped as "controls," and all Graf type IIa (-) hips were considered as "cases." Maternal age, presence of consanguinity, pregnancy, and smoking were considered as maternal risk factors. Sex, birth weight, gestational age, associated congenital anomalies, and family history were considered as infant risk factors. Further, we determined the risk factors for Graf type IIa and type IIa (-) hips. Results: The study population included 73 cases (11.4%) and 569 controls (88.6%), including 322 (50.2%) male and 320 (49.8%) female infants. Graf type IIa hips revealed significant differences for gestational age (>42 wk), birthweight (>3500 g), and maternal age (<= 20 y). At follow-up, all Graf type IIa(+) hips became Graf type I mature hips. In contrast, three Graf type IIa(-) hips (3/12, 25%) required additional treatment. Conclusion: Significant risk factors for Graf type IIa(-) hips were female sex, gestational age of >42 wk, and birthweight of >3500 g. Almost one-quarter of Graf type IIa (-) hips may require additional treatment. Thus, significant risk factors for Graf type IIa(-)should be remembered in clinical practice.