Tıp Fakültesi / Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1403

Browse

Filters

2017 - 20203

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Dolek, YemlihaSubject: search.filters.subject.Radiotherapy

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The İmpact of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Setup Errors During External Beam Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    (2017) Onal, Cem; Dolek, Yemliha; Ozdemir, Yurday; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 0000-0002-2218-2074; 28409246; HOC-5611-2023; AAG-5629-2021
    Purpose To determine whether setup errors during external beam radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer are influenced by the combination of androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) and RT. Materials and methods Data from 175 patients treated for prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment was as follows: concurrent ADT plus RT, 33 patients (19%); neoadjuvant and concurrent ADT plus RT, 91 patients (52%); RT only, 51 patients (29%). Required couch shifts without rotations were recorded for each megavoltage (MV) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan, and corresponding alignment shifts were recorded as left-right (x), superior-inferior (y), and anterior-posterior (z). The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used to compare shifts by group. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to measure the correlation of couch shifts between groups. Mean prostate shifts and standard deviations (SD) were calculated and pooled to obtain mean or group systematic error (M), SD of systematic error (Sigma), and SD of random error (sigma). Results No significant differences were observed in prostate shifts in any direction between the groups. Shifts on CBCT were all less than setup margins. A significant positive correlation was observed between prostate volume and the z-direction prostate shift (r = 0.19, p = 0.04), regardless of ADT group, but not between volume and x- or y-direction shifts (r = 0.04, p = 0.7; r = 0.03, p = 0.7). Random and systematic errors for all patient cohorts and ADT groups were similar. Conclusion Hormone therapy given concurrently with RT was not found to significantly impact setup errors. Prostate volume was significantly correlated with shifts in the anterior-posterior direction only.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Incidental testicular doses during volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients
    (2020) Onal, Cem; Bozca, Recep; Dolek, Yemliha; Guler, Ozan Cem; Arslan, Gungor; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 32125635; AAC-5654-2020; D-5195-2014
    Purpose To compare the incidental testicular doses during volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients receiving prostate-only and pelvic lymphatic irradiation. Materials and methods Testicular doses in 40 intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients were determined on treatment planning system (TPS) using the VMAT technique at 6 MV. Scattered testicular doses were also measured by MOSFET detectors placed on testis surface. The testicular doses of patients treated with prostate-only and pelvic field irradiation were compared. Results The median testicular doses measured per 200 cGy fraction by TPS and MOSFET detectors were 1.7 cGy (0.7-4.1 cGy) and 4.8 cGy (3.6-8.8 cGy), respectively. The TPS doses and MOSFET readings showed a significant strong correlation (Pearson r = 0.848, p < 0.001). The testicular doses measured by TPS (1.34 +/- 0.36 cGy vs. 2.60 +/- 0.95 cGy; p < 0.001) and MOSFET (4.52 +/- 0.64 cGy vs. 6.56 +/- 1.23 cGy; p < 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with prostate-only irradiation than in those with pelvic field irradiation. The mean cumulative scattered dose for prostate-only field delivering 78 Gy was 1.8 Gy and that for pelvic field irradiation was 2.6 Gy, consistent with the reported findings. Conclusions The patients with prostate-only irradiation received lower testicular doses than those with additional pelvic field irradiation possibly due to the increased scattered doses in large field irradiation using the VMAT technique. The clinical response to increased incidental testicular doses due to pelvic field irradiation remains unknown, and it warrants further investigation.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Role of 68-Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in pelvic radiotherapy field definitions for lymph node coverage in prostate cancer patients
    (2020) Onal, Cem; Ozyigit, Gokhan; Guler, Ozan Cem; Hurmuz, Pervin; Torun, Nese; Tuncel, Murat; Dolek, Yemliha; Yedekci, Yagiz; Oymak, Ezgi; Tilki, Burak; Akyol, Fadil; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 32861704; AAE-2718-2021; D-5195-2014; AAC-5654-2020
    Purpose: To evaluate the distribution of metastatic lymph nodes (LN) detected on Ga-68-PSMA-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in treatment-naive prostate cancer (PC) patients and to analyze the LN coverage rates of the pelvic fields defined in the GETUG trial and RTOG guidelines and a pelvic field extending superiorly from the L4/L5 interspace. Materials and methods: Ga-68-PSMA-PET/CT images obtained at diagnosis of 138 PC patients were retro-spectively analyzed. The number and locations of Ga-68-PSMA-positive LNs were co-registered with one single-planning CT. The numbers, locations, and sizes of LNs located outside the three pelvic volumes were investigated for the entire cohort and for patients with LN metastasis in the pelvic area only. Results: A total of 441 PSMA-PET-positive LN metastases were identified. The most frequent metastatic LNs were internal iliac LNs (25.2%). Para-aortic and presacral LNs outside the three pelvic fields were present in 20 (14.5%) and 22 patients (15.9%), respectively. The LN coverage rates according to the GETUG trial, the RTOG guidelines, and the pelvic field extending superiorly from L4/L5 were 44.2%, 52.2%, and 71, respectively, in the entire cohort and 51.7%, 61 and 83.1%, respectively, in patients with only pelvic LN metastasis. The number of metastatic LNs was a predictive factor for LNs located outside the three pelvic fields. Conclusions: Extending the cranial margin of the pelvic field from L5/S1 to L4/L5 increases the accuracy of pelvic field irradiation in approximately 20% of patients, highlighting the importance of proximal common iliac irradiation, particularly in patients with multiple LN metastasis. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.