Tıp Fakültesi / Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1403

Browse

Filters

2015 - 20182

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Celebi, ArzuSubject: search.filters.subject.Sedation

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Addition of Low-Dose Ketamine to Midazolam-Fentanyl-Propofol-Based Sedation for Colonoscopy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
    (2015) Tuncali, Bahattin; Pekcan, Yonca Ozvardar; Celebi, Arzu; Zeyneloglu, Pinar; 0000-0002-7898-2943; 0000-0002-0991-7435; 0000-0003-2312-9942; 25801162; AAJ-7840-2021; AAD-5696-2021; C-3736-2018
    Study Objective: To evaluate the effects of low-dose ketamine on midazolam-fentanyl-propofol-based sedation for outpatient colonoscopy. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Gastroenterology unit at a practice and clinical research center. Subjects: Ninety-seven healthy American Society of Anesthesiology physical status 1 volunteers. Interventions: Subjects were randomized to receive midazolam (0.02 mg/kg), fentanyl (1 mu g/kg), and ketamine (0.3 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.02 mg/kg), fentanyl (1 mu g/kg), and placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) in group K and group C, respectively. In both groups, incremental doses of propofol were used to maintain a Ramsay sedation score of 3 to 4. Measurements: Values of heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate were measured. Procedure times, recovery times, drug doses used, complications associated with the sedation, and physician and patient satisfaction were also recorded. Main Results: In group K, mean amount of propofol used and mean induction time (P < .001), the need for the use of jaw thrust maneuver and mask ventilation, and the incidence of disruptive movements were significantly lower (P < .05) and gastroenterologist satisfaction at the beginning of the procedure was significantly superior (P < .05). Mean systolic blood pressures at 4, 6, 8, and 10 minutes (P < .01); diastolic blood pressures at 4, 6, and 8 minutes (P < .05); respiratory rates at 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, and 25 minutes (P < .01); and oxygen saturation at 6, 8, 10, 15, and 20 minutes (P < .05) were significantly lower in group C. Patient satisfaction scores, recovery times, and discharge times were similar. No patient in either group experienced unpleasant dreams or hallucination in the postanesthesia care unit and on the first postoperative day. Conclusions: Addition of low-dose ketamine to midazolam-fentanyl-propofol-based sedation for outpatient colonoscopy resulted in more rapid and better quality of sedation, less propofol consumption, more stable heinodynamic status, and less adverse effects with similar recovery times in adult patients. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ambulatory colonoscopy under sedoanalgesia in adult patients with and without irritable bowel syndrome: A prospective, cross-sectional, and double-blind comparison
    (2018) Tuncali, Bahattin; Araz, Coskun; Celebi, Arzu; 29755018
    Background/Aims: it is unclear whether patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) require a high dose of sedatives during colonoscopy. In this study, we investigated the pre-procedural anxiety levels, sedative consumption, procedure times, complications, and patient's satisfaction between patients with IBS and controls for ambulatory colonoscopy under sedation. Materials and Methods: Rome III criteria were used in the diagnosis of IBS. Anxiety levels were measured using Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BA/). Patients received a fixed dose of midazolam (0.02 mg/kg), fentanyl (1 mu g/kg), ketamine (0.3 mg/kg), and incremental doses of propofol under sedation protocol. Demographic data, heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were measured. Procedure times, recovery and discharge times, drug doses used, complications associated with the sedation, and patient's satisfaction scores were also recorded. Results: The mean Trait (p=0.015), State (p=0.029), Beck anxiety scores (p=0.018), the incidence of disruptive movements (p=0.044), and the amount of propofol (p=0.024) used were significantly higher in patients with IBS. There was a decline in mean systolic blood pressure at the 6th minute in patients with IBS (p=0.026). No association was found between the sedative requirement and the anxiety scores. Conclusion: Patients with IBS who underwent elective colonoscopy procedures expressed higher pre-procedural anxiety scores, required more propofol consumption, and experienced more disruptive movements compared with controls. On the contrary, the increased propofol consumption was not associated with the increased pre-procedural anxiety scores.