Tıp Fakültesi / Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1403

Browse

Filters

2014 - 20182

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Aydinalp, AlpSubject: search.filters.subject.Allograft vasculopathy

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Follow-Up of Heart Transplant Recipients with Serial Echocardiographic Coronary Flow Reserve and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography to Detect Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy
    (2014) Sade, Leyla Elif; Eroglu, Serpil; Yuce, Deniz; Bircan, Asli; Pirat, Bahar; Sezgin, Atilla; Aydinalp, Alp; Muderrisoglu, Haldun; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3737-8595; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-7953; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-8630; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3761-8782; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9635-6313; 24613313; AAQ-7583-2021; ABG-1582-2021; AAI-8897-2021; AAD-5841-2021; AAG-8233-2020
    Background: Implementation of reliable noninvasive testing for screening cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is of critical importance. The most widely used modality, dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), has moderate sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this study was to assess the potential role of serial coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessment together with DSE for predicting CAV. Methods: A total of 90 studies were performed prospectively over 5 years in 23 consecutive heart transplant recipients who survived > 1 year after transplantation. Assessment of CFR with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, DSE, coronary angiography, and endomyocardial biopsy was performed annually. Results of CFR assessment and DSE were compared with angiographic findings of CAV. Results: Acute cellular rejections were excluded by endomyocardial biopsies. CAV was detected in 17 of 90 angiograms. Mean CFR was similarly lower in both mild (CAV grade 1) and more severe (CAV grades 2 and 3) vasculopathy, but wall motion score index became higher in parallel with increasing grades of vasculopathy. Any CAV by angiography was detected either simultaneously with or later than CFR impairment, yielding 100% sensitivity for CFR. The combination of CFR and DSE increased the specificity of the latter from 64.3% to 87.2% without compromising sensitivity (77.8%). Conclusions: CFR is very sensitive for detecting CAV and increases the diagnostic accuracy of DSE, raising the potential for patient management tailored to risk modification and to avoid unnecessary angiographic procedures.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Prevalence and Angiographic Characteristics of Coronary Vasospasm Detected at Surveillance Coronary Angiograms Among Patients With Heart Transplants
    (2018) Akgun, Arzu Neslihan; Ciftci, Orcun; Yilmaz, Kerem Can; Karacaglar, Emir; Aydinalp, Alp; Sezgin, Atilla; Muderrisoglu, I. Haldun; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-1752-4877; 0000-0001-8926-9142; 0000-0002-2538-1642; 0000-0002-3761-8782; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 29527999; HJP-8792-2023; W-5233-2018; AAJ-1331-2021; ABI-6723-2020; AAD-5841-2021; AAJ-8097-2021
    Objectives: Coronary vasospasm in heart transplant recipients occurs through various mechanisms. It has been linked to allograft rejection and coronary vasculopathy, which can result in mortality during follow-up. Here, we investigated the prevalence of coronary vasospasm among heart transplant recipients undergoing surveillance coronary angiography procedures. Materials and Methods: This study was prospectively performed at Baskent University Faculty of Medicine by retrospectively analyzing medical information of patients who underwent bicaval heart transplant between 2003 and 2016 and subsequently had coronary angiography to rule out allograft vasculopathy. We analyzed prevalence of coronary vasospasm, affected vessels, underlying vessel properties, and treatment modalities. Coronary vasospasm was defined as transient diffuse or localized lumina! narrowing, either spontaneously or catheter-induced, relieved spontaneously or with nitroglycerine. Results: Forty-one coronary angiography procedures were performed using the standard Judkins technique. Among these, 5 patients showed coronary vasospasm a mean of 2 years after cardiac transplant. All vasospasm episodes involved the left anterior descending artery, with 2 also involving the circumflex artery and 1 involving the right coronary artery. The degree of luminal narrowing ranged from mild to severe. Episodes that involved the left anterior descending artery more often diffusely involved most of the vessel. In 3 patients, vasospasms were recurrent. Three patients had underlying coronary artery disease, which was relieved in 2 patients who progressed by stent implant. Neither ischemic events nor reduction of ejection fraction was observed during follow-up. There were also no occurrences of cellular or humoral rejection or death in any of the patients with vasospasm. Conclusions: Coronary vasospasm is common in heart transplant recipients. It may be diffuse or localized and occur spontaneously or because of underlying coronary artery disease. Factors, including allograft vasculopathy, associated with coronary vasospasm remain to be determined, and further related research is needed.