Tıp Fakültesi / Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1403

Browse

Filters

2017 - 201912020 - 20211

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Arslan, Serdarsearch.filters.applied.f.publicationcategory: search.filters.publicationcategory.Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Interobserver and Intermethod Variability in Data Interpretation of Breast Strain Elastography in Suspicious Breast Lesions
    (2021) Turnaoglu, Hale; Haberal, Kemal Murat; Arslan, Serdar; Yavuz Colak, Meric; Ulu Ozturk, Funda; Uslu, Nihal; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0781-0036; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8211-4065; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-4326; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0294-6874; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-2824; 32950046; AAK-8242-2021; R-9398-2019; AAA-4360-2021; JCP-5266-2023
    Background/aim: Strain elastography has the disadvantage of being operator-dependent. Interobserver variability is observed during image acquisition and interpretation. This study aimed to analyze the interobserver and intermethod variability of strain elastography in image interpretation and evaluate the diagnostic performance combining elasticity score and strain ratio with ultrasonography. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 70 breast lesions evaluated with B-mode ultrasonography and strain elastography. B-mode ultrasonography findings, elasticity scores, and strain ratio values were evaluated using static images by two radiologists. BI-RADS assessment of the lesions and the decision of both observers as to whether the biopsy was required using B-mode ultrasonography, and the combined ultrasonography+elasticity score, and the combined ultrasonography+elasticity score+strain ratio were compared with the histopathological results. Also, the interobserver agreement was analyzed for all the combinations. Results: There was very good agreement (weighted kappa = 0.865) between the observers for the elasticity scores. Very good agreement was observed between the observers for BI-RADS assessments using the combined ultrasonography+elasticity score and the combined ultrasonography+elasticity score+strain ratio (weighted kappa = 0.848, and 0.902, respectively). Area under the curve of B-mode ultrasonography, the combined B-mode ultrasonography+elasticity score, and the combined B-mode ultrasonography+elasticity score+strain ratio, were calculated as 0.859, 0.866, and 0.916 for observer 1, and 0.851, 0.829, and 0.916 for observer 2, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the observers' diagnostic performances in any of the combinations (P = 0.703, 0.067, and 0.972, respectively). Conclusion: In the evaluation and further assessment of breast lesions, semiquantitative strain ratio calculation may help improve diagnostic accuracy by reducing interpretational variety, when used together with B-mode ultrasonography and elasticity scoring, especially for inexperienced individuals.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Can Strain Elastography Combined with Ultrasound Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Be A More Effective Method in The Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions?
    (2017) Arslan, Serdar; Uslu, Nihal; Ozturk, Funda Ulu; Akcay, Eda Yilmaz; Tezcaner, Tugan; Agildere, Ahmet Muhtesem; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-4326; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6733-8669; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-9585; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3641-8674; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4223-7017; 28154989; AAH-9796-2019; ABC-5258-2020; AAK-1960-2021; AAD-9865-2021; AAB-5802-2020
    To investigate whether a novel method that combines breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) with strain elastography contributes to diagnostic performance in differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. In 81 patients, 81 breast lesions were prospectively investigated. Breast lesions were separately evaluated with ultrasonography and strain elastography. While evaluations with ultrasonography were based on 2003 BI-RADS-US, strain elastography evaluations were based on a 5-point scale and strain ratio. Diagnostic performances of ultrasonography, strain elastography, and the combined method were compared. Among 81 lesions, 43 (53.1%) were benign and 38 (46.9%) were malignant. When a cutoff point of category 3 was used, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for BI-RADS were 100, 11.6, 50, 100, and 53%, respectively. When BI-RADS and strain ratio were combined, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were 89.5, 93, 91.9, 90.9, and 91.3%, respectively. When BI-RADS and elastography scores were combined, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were 86.8, 97.7, 97.1, 89.4, and 92.5%, respectively. The combination of strain elastography and BI-RADS was found to have better diagnostic performances to diagnose breast lesions than BI-RADS alone.