Tıp Fakültesi / Faculty of Medicine
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1403
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item The History of Liver Transplantation in Turkey(2014) Moray, Gokhan; Arslan, Gulnaz; Haberal, Mehmet; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-7287; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-7632; 24635786; AAE-1041-2021; AAJ-8097-2021Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for end-stage liver diseases. The first successful liver transplant was performed in the United States by Thomas Starzl in 1967. The first successful solidorgan transplant in Turkey was a living-related kidney transplant performed by Dr. Haberal in 1975. After much effort by Dr. Haberal, the Turkish parliament enacted a law about organ transplantation in 1979. After clinical and experimental studies, the first liver transplant in Turkey was performed by Dr. Haberal in 1988. The first successful partial living-donor liver transplant in children in Turkey was performed by the same team on March 15, 1990. On April 24, 1990, the first living-donor liver transplant was performed on a child in Turkey using a left lateral segment by Dr. Haberal and coworkers. On May 16, 1992, Dr. Haberal performed a simultaneous living-donor liver and kidney transplantation to an adult from the same donor. There currently are 30 liver transplantation centers in Turkey. According to data from the Ministry of Health, there presently are 2065 patients in Turkey who are waiting for a liver transplantation. From January 2002 to June 2013, there were 6091 liver transplants performed in Turkey (4020 living-donor [66%] and 2071 deceased-donor liver transplants [34%]). From January 2011 to June 2013, there were 2514 patients who had liver transplants in Turkey, and 437 patients (17%) died. The number of liver transplants per year in Turkey reached 1000 transplants in 2012 and more than 1150 transplants in 2013 (15.1/million/y). Therefore, Turkey has one of the highest volumes of liver. transplantation per population worldwide, with 90% survival within 1 year after transplantation.Item Large-for-Size Liver Transplant: A Single-Center Experience(2015) Akdur, Aydincan; Kirnap, Mahir; Ozcay, Figen; Sezgin, Atilla; Soy, Hatice Ebru Ayvazoglu; Yarbug, Feza Karakayali; Yildirim, Sedat; Moray, Gokhan; Arslan, Gulnaz; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-8726-3369; 0000-0002-5735-4315; 0000-0003-2498-7287; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0002-0993-9917; 0000-0002-5214-516X; 25894137; AAA-3068-2021; AAF-4610-2019; AAE-1041-2021; AAJ-8097-2021; AAH-9198-2019; AAC-5566-2019; ABG-5684-2020Objectives: The ideal ratio between liver transplant graft mass and recipient body weight is unknown, but the graft probably must weigh 0.8% to 2.0% recipient weight. When this ratio > 4%, there may be problems due to large-for-size transplant, especially in recipients < 10 kg. This condition is caused by discrepancy between the small abdominal cavity and large graft and is characterized by decreased blood supply to the liver graft and graft dysfunction. We evaluated our experience with large-for-size grafts. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 377 orthotopic liver transplants that were performed from 2001-2014 in our center. We included 188 pediatric transplants in our study. Results: There were 58 patients < 10 kg who had living-donor living transplant with graft-to-body-weight ratio > 4%. In 2 patients, the abdomen was closed with a Bogota bag. In 5 patients, reoperation was performed due to vascular problems and abdominal hypertension, and the abdomen was closed with a Bogota bag. All Bogota bags were closed in 2 weeks. After closing the fascia, 10 patients had vascular problems that were diagnosed in the operating room by Doppler ultrasonography, and only the skin was closed without fascia closure. No graft loss occurred due to large-for-size transplant. There were 8 patients who died early after transplant (sepsis, 6 patients; brain death, 2 patients). There was no major donor morbidity or donor mortality. Conclusions: Large-for-size graft may cause abdominal compartment syndrome due to the small size of the recipient abdominal cavity, size discrepancies in vascular caliber, insufficient portal circulation, and disturbance of tissue oxygenation. Abdominal closure with a Bogota bag in these patients is safe and effective to avoid abdominal compartment syndrome. Early diagnosis by ultrasonography in the operating room after fascia closure and repeated ultrasonography at the clinic may help avoid graft loss.Item Results of Pediatric Liver Transplant: A Single-Center Experience(2015) Moray, Gokhan; Tezcaner, Tugan; Akdur, Aydincan; Ozcay, Figen; Sezgin, Atilla; Kirnap, Mahir; Yildirim, Sedat; Arslan, Gulnaz; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-3641-8674; 0000-0002-8726-3369; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0002-5735-4315; 0000-0002-5214-516X; 0000-0003-2498-7287; 25894129; AAH-9198-2019; AAD-9865-2021; AAA-3068-2021; AAJ-8097-2021; AAF-4610-2019; ABG-5684-2020; AAE-1041-2021Objectives: Liver transplant is an established curative therapy for children with chronic end-stage liver disease or acute liver failure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate pediatric liver transplant in terms of outcomes, complications, and long-term follow-up results. Materials and Methods: Pediatric patients who had liver transplant in our institution were included. We retrospectively evaluated demographic features including body weight, Child-Pugh score, etiology of liver disease, graft source, perioperative outcomes, perioperative complications, postoperative complications, and long-term results. Outcomes of treatment of complications and revision transplant were evaluated. Results: Between September 2001 and December 2013, there were 188 pediatric liver transplants performed in our institution. Most grafts (90.9%) were obtained from living-related donors. There were 13 patients (6.9%) who had an intervention because of a hemorrhage postoperatively. Biliary leakage was observed in 33 patients (17.5%) and biliary stricture during follow-up was observed in 32 patients (17%). Thrombosis rates in the hepatic artery and portal vein were 12.3% and 0.5%. Revision transplant was performed in 11 patients (5.8%); reason for revision transplant was rejection in 50% patients. The remaining children were alive with good graft functioning after treatment of complications and revision transplant. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 82.3% and 78.9%. Conclusions: The overall outcomes of pediatric liver transplant at our center are very promising. With improved care of younger children and the combined efforts of the parents and medical team, the number of the children receiving transplants will increase in the future.