Evaluating Stack Splint Use for Mallet Finger

dc.contributor.authorAyhan, Egemen
dc.contributor.authorKuzucu, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorAslaner, Emrah Efe
dc.contributor.authorTuna, Zeynep
dc.contributor.pubmedID33559583en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T11:19:50Z
dc.date.available2022-09-15T11:19:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: Stack splint is commonly used for mallet finger treatment but patients had a tendency to frequently remove it because of skin complications. We hypothesized that a comprehensively instructed splinting regime would increase patients' compliance and lead to favorable outcomes with fewer skin complications. The aims of this study were to assess the patients' compliance and to evaluate outcomes with that particular splinting regime. Methods: Forty-six consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study. They were instructed to wear the Stack splint for 24 hours a day every day in the first six weeks and remove it once a day for 10 minutes to vent. They were told to support distal interphalangeal joint volarly both while wearing the splint and when it was removed. Free movement of proximal interphalangeal joint within the splint was checked after each application. Following whole-day regime for 6 weeks, night splinting continued for 2 more weeks. Range of motion, skin complications, patients' compliance and satisfaction were assessed at last follow-up. Results: There were 26 patients with a mean age of 39.8 and mean follow-up period of 6.7 months. No skin complications or proximal interphalangeal joint stiffness were reported. However, nine patients declared that they wore the splint <= 4 weeks, the compliance rate to our regime was 65.4% (17/26). In the 17 fully compliant patients, mean distal interphalangeal joint extension lag was 12.4 and nine of them (52.9%) were satisfied with the outcome. Conclusions: Our both hypotheses failed; comprehensive instructions for the splinting regime did not improve patients' compliance satisfactorily, nor did it lead to favorable outcomes. Although Stack splint has practical points, we no longer use it.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage51en_US
dc.identifier.issn2424-8355en_US
dc.identifier.issue01en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85101216428en_US
dc.identifier.startpage47en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/7774
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wos000616269500008en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1142/S2424835521500077en_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-ASIAN-PACIFIC VOLUMEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMallet fingeren_US
dc.subjectStack splinten_US
dc.subjectSkin irritationen_US
dc.subjectExtension lagen_US
dc.titleEvaluating Stack Splint Use for Mallet Fingeren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: