Which is responsible for target organ damage in masked hypertension? Is it an increase in blood pressure or a disruption of the circadian rhythm?

dc.contributor.authorAkbay, Ertan
dc.contributor.authorConer, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAkinci, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Ali Riza
dc.contributor.authorToktamis, Aydin
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-9146-0621en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-5711-8873en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-5250-5404en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID33870802en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAD-5479-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDABD-7321-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAD-5564-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-13T08:29:05Z
dc.date.available2022-09-13T08:29:05Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractMasked hypertension (MH) and non-dipping pattern are conditions associated with target organ damage and cardiovascular risk, which are frequently observed together. We aimed to show the relationship between the target organ damage observed in MH and the deterioration in the dipping pattern. Methods Patients who underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and office blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg were retrospectively screened. In ABPM data, those with daytime BP >= 135/85 mmHg and night BP >= 120/70 mmHg were included in the MH group, while the others were included in the normotensive group. The patients were grouped as dipper, non-dipper and reverse-dipper according to ABPM results. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and serum creatinine levels were used to determine target organ damage. Results 289 patients [mean age 46.6 +/- 12.4 years, 136 (47.1%) males], 154 (53.3%) of whom had MH were included in our study. GFR value was found to be significantly lower, serum creatinine levels and LVMI were significantly higher in patients with MH compared to normotensives (p < .05, for all). When the subgroups were examined, it was found that this difference was associated with the disruption in the dipping pattern. In patients with MH, dipping pattern disruption without change in systolic BP was independently associated with an increase in LVMI (p < .05, for both). Conclusion Target organ damage seen in MH may be due to the deterioration of the dipping pattern.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage585en_US
dc.identifier.issn1064-1963en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104735576en_US
dc.identifier.startpage579en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/7710
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.wos000641370200001en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/10641963.2021.1916946en_US
dc.relation.journalCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAmbulatory blood pressure monitoringen_US
dc.subjectcircadian rhythmen_US
dc.subjectmasked hypertensionen_US
dc.subjectnon-dippingen_US
dc.subjectreverse dippingen_US
dc.titleWhich is responsible for target organ damage in masked hypertension? Is it an increase in blood pressure or a disruption of the circadian rhythm?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: