Role of myocardial strain and rotation for predicting prosthetic aortic valve stenosis

dc.contributor.authorOzyildiz, Afag
dc.contributor.authorPirat, Bahar
dc.contributor.authorOzyildiz, Ali Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorMuderrisoglu, Haldun
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-0679-9434en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID34626295en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDD-2856-2015en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-08T12:32:24Z
dc.date.available2022-08-08T12:32:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPressure overload due to aortic stenosis leads to subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and global longitudinal strain (GLS) impairment even if ejection fraction is preserved. However, little is known about LV mechanics in aortic prosthetic valve (APV) stenosis. The study aimed to determine the role of myocardial strain and rotation in predicting prosthetic valve stenosis in mechanical APV patients. 60 patients with mechanical APV and 30 healthy individuals were evaluated. APV patients were analyzed in two groups; aortic valve mean gradient < 20 mmHg (27 normal gradient patients) and >= 20 mmHg (33 high gradient patients). Strain, rotation, and twist values were assessed using the speckle tracking method, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were measured. Four-chamber (p < 0.001) and two-chamber (p = 0.008) longitudinal strain (LS) were higher in the control group. GLS was lower in the high gradient group than control and normal gradient groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.022). LS of lateral wall's basal and mid segments were lower in normal and high gradient groups than the control group (p = 0.003, p = 0.008). While basal rotation was lower in the high gradient group than the control group (p = 0.048), there was no difference between the groups in terms of apical rotation, and twist. BNP levels were significantly different between the groups (p = 0.048). No correlation was found between aortic valve mean gradient and GLS, basal rotation, and BNP. In conclusions, LV GLS and basal rotation are depressed in high APV gradient patients; however, these parameters are not independent predictors of gradient increment.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage560en_US
dc.identifier.issn1569-5794en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85116928393en_US
dc.identifier.startpage551en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/7274
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wos000705797600001en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s10554-021-02431-9en_US
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGINGen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMechanical aortic prosthetic valveen_US
dc.subjectStrain echocardiographyen_US
dc.subjectRotationen_US
dc.subjectBNPen_US
dc.titleRole of myocardial strain and rotation for predicting prosthetic aortic valve stenosisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: