Fertility Sparing in Uterine Sarcomas: Single Center Experience of 13 Patients

dc.contributor.authorTunc, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorTohma, Yusuf Aytac
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Han Ifi
dc.contributor.authorAkilli, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorKarakas, Latife Atasoy
dc.contributor.authorAltundag, Ozden
dc.contributor.authorHaberal, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAyhan, Ali
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9418-4733en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-8441en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7369-5470en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0197-6622en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-7209en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAE-6482-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAX-3230-2020en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAEY-5060-2022en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDW-9219-2019en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAI-9331-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-5802-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T11:21:26Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T11:21:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractPurpose of Investigation: The feasibility and safety of conservative surgery is not well defined for fertility sparing approach for uterine sarcoma due to very low incidence and poor prognosis. The authors present their experience regarding fertility preservation for uterine sarcoma. Materials and Methods: A total of 13 patients with uterine sarcoma were included in this retrospective case study; endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) (n=6) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (n=7). Patients data, including clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic information were extracted from medical records. Excision of mass and reconstruction of uterus was performed for fertility sparing in all patients and staging surgery (bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy +/- omentectomy) as performed for five cases (one ESS case and four LMS cases). Results: The median size of the mass was 8.5 (range: 1-22) cm. Median follow-up time was 54 (range 13-142) months. Recurrence rate was 69.2% (9/13). The mean relapse interval was 30.69 months. Four patients died and all of them was diagnosed with LMS. Four pregnancies (37%) were recorded. Two of them occurred with assisted reproductive technologies (intracytoplasmic sperm injection), the other two pregnancies were spontaneous, and all of them had a cesarean delivery. Conclusion: Patients should be informed about prognosis of uterine sarcomas and risk of fertility preserving approach. Close follow-up is obligatory and complementary surgery should be performed after completion of fertility due to high recurrence rate and poor prognosis especially with LMS.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage310en_US
dc.identifier.issn0392-2936en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85067050547en_US
dc.identifier.startpage305en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/10506
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.wos000465531800024en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.12892/ejgo4502.2019en_US
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFertility preservationen_US
dc.subjectUterine sarcomasen_US
dc.subjectLeiomyosarcomaen_US
dc.subjectEndometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS)en_US
dc.titleFertility Sparing in Uterine Sarcomas: Single Center Experience of 13 Patientsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: