A Comparison between Mygind and Kaiteki positions in administration of drops to the olfactory cleft

dc.contributor.authorMilk, Dafna G.
dc.contributor.authorKhong, Grace C.
dc.contributor.authorCam, Osman H.
dc.contributor.authorAlfaro-Iraheta, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorTierney, Claire
dc.contributor.authorKassem, Firas
dc.contributor.authorLeong, Samuel C.
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2785-4474en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID33326692en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T10:49:12Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T10:49:12Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjectives Topical nasal steroids are a common treatment intervention for olfactory dysfunction. Penetration of topic treatment to the olfactory cleft (OC), such as nasal drops, is greatly dependent on the position of the head when the treatment is administered. We aimed to examine the penetrance of nasal drops to the OC in two different head positions: the Mygind (lying head back) position and the Kaiteki position. Design and Setting The specimens were firstly positioned in Mygind, and thereafter in Kaiteki positions. Nasal drops mixed with blue food dye were administered into the nostrils in each of the head position. Endoscopic videos were recorded, and two blinded observers scored the extent of olfactory cleft penetration (OCP) using a 4-point scale (0 = none, 3 = heavy). Participants Twelve fresh-frozen cadaver specimens. Main outcome measures Penetration of the dye into the OC. Results The mean score of nasal drops penetrance to the OC in the Mygind position was 1.34 (standard deviation, SD = 0.92), as compared to 1.76 (SD = 0.65) in the Kaiteki position. The difference in the OCP score between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > .05). Conclusion Both Mygind and Kaiteki head positions are reasonable options for patients considering topical nasal drops for olfaction impairment. The preference of one position over the other should be determined by patient's preference and comfort.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage411en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-4478en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85099072416en_US
dc.identifier.startpage406en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coa.13690?src=getftr
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/7868
dc.identifier.volume46en_US
dc.identifier.wos000604262200001en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/coa.13690en_US
dc.relation.journalCLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGYen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectanosmiaen_US
dc.subjectnasal dropsen_US
dc.subjectolfactionen_US
dc.subjectolfactory cleften_US
dc.titleA Comparison between Mygind and Kaiteki positions in administration of drops to the olfactory cleften_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
90.pdf
Size:
507.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: