Stones Hounsfield Unit Value And Predictors Of Urinary Leakage After PCNL

dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorYikilmaz, Taha Numan
dc.contributor.authorHamidi, Nurullah
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Funda Ulu
dc.contributor.authorSelvi, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorBasar, Halil
dc.contributor.authorResorlu, Berkan
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T10:29:47Z
dc.date.available2022-11-24T10:29:47Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground To evaluate the predictive factors of urinary leakage (UL) following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and to investigate the relationship between Hounsfield unit (HU) of stone and UL. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 728 patients who underwent PNL between January 2012 and January 2017. In total, 396 patients were eligible for the study. Patient demographics, renal factors, stone properties and operative details were collected. The association between UL and these variables were assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results There was no statistically significant correlation considering age, body mass index and the presence of hypertension. The presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) was significantly correlated with UL (p < 0.001). Kidney related factors such as parenchymal thickness, hydronephrosis grade (HN), previous stone treatment, and stone related factors, such as stone surface area, stone burden, stone localization and HU value of stone, were found to affect UL status significantly (p < 0.001). Operation time, fluoroscopy time, treatment outcome, j stent use, percutenous nephrostomy (PCN) catheter stay time and the hospitalization time also had significant effect on UL (p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic analysis showed that presence of DM, parenchymal thickness, HU values, HN, operation time, j stent use, and PCN catheter stay time are independently related with UL following PCNL. Moreover, we determined a HU cut-off value of 933 with ROC analysis, which demostrated 84.9% sensitivity and 67.1% specificity for predicting UL. Conclusion This study has shown that we are more likely to encounter postoperative UL in stones with higher HU values. Therefore, we suggest clinicians to inform patients with this type of kidney stones about the probable complication of UL.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1110-5704en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127273077en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://afju.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12301-022-00281-y
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/8160
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wos000773938500001en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/s12301-022-00281-yen_US
dc.relation.journalAFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectUrinary leakageen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subjectPredicitive factorsen_US
dc.subjectStone densityen_US
dc.subjectStone Hounsfield uniten_US
dc.titleStones Hounsfield Unit Value And Predictors Of Urinary Leakage After PCNLen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
61.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: