Clinical Features of Untreated Type 2 Macular Telangiectasia and Efficacy of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Macular Neovascularization
dc.contributor.author | Karatas, Muge Coban | |
dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz, Gursel | |
dc.contributor.author | Sezen, Aslihan Yuce | |
dc.contributor.author | Sariturk, Cagla | |
dc.contributor.pubmedID | 35196839 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-15T14:27:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-15T14:27:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To compare best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and central choroidal thickness (CCT) in patients with type 2 macular telangiectasia (MacTel 2) and a control group and to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment in MacTel 2 patients with macular neovascularization (MNV). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive MacTel 2 patients who underwent a full ophthalmologic examination including BCVA and dilated fundus examination with slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography imaging at baseline and follow-up visits. BCVA, CMT, and CCT were compared between all identified patients (n=26) and a control group (n=30). A subgroup analysis was performed among eyes with MNV (n=7) before and after treatment. Results: CMT and CCT were significantly lower in the MacTel 2 group compared to the control group. Forty-one treatment-naive eyes without MNV proliferation showed no significant change in BCVA, CMT, or CCT during follow-up. Eight eyes of 7 MacTel 2 patients developed MNV during follow-up. All of the patients were treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF. Conclusion: It is important to closely follow MacTel 2 patients for MNV development. To avoid adverse effects, we prefer to monitor patients who have not yet developed MNV. Patients with proliferative MacTel 2 with decreasing visual function may benefit from intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 49 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1300-0659 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85125215186 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 45 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://cms.oftalmoloji.org/Uploads/Article_50958/TJO-52-45-En.pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11727/8116 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 52 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000761159800008 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.75608 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Macular telangiectasia | en_US |
dc.subject | macular neovascularization | en_US |
dc.subject | anti-VEGF treatment | en_US |
dc.title | Clinical Features of Untreated Type 2 Macular Telangiectasia and Efficacy of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Macular Neovascularization | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |