Comparison of no adjuvant treatment and radiotherapy in early-stage cervical carcinoma with intermediate risk factors

dc.contributor.authorAkilli, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorTohma, Yusuf A.
dc.contributor.authorBulut, Ayca N.
dc.contributor.authorKarakas, Latife Atasoy
dc.contributor.authorHaberal, Asuman N.
dc.contributor.authorKuscu, Ulku E.
dc.contributor.authorAyhan, Ali
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-5240-8441en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-7369-5470en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-0992-6980en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-9418-4733en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-9852-9911en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID32246761en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAX-3230-2020en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAI-8793-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAI-8792-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAE-6482-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAK-4587-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-5802-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-21T07:38:27Z
dc.date.available2021-06-21T07:38:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractObjective To evaluate the results of receiving no adjuvant treatment (NAT) or radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 Stage IB1-IB3 cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Baskent University School of Medicine's Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics in Ankara, Turkey between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016. In total, 134 women with at least two intermediate risk factors (positive LVSI, deep stromal invasion, and tumor size >= 4 cm) were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: NAT and radiotherapy. Results There were 66 patients in the NAT group and 68 in the radiotherapy group. The median follow-up time was 61.05 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were similar in both groups (84.1% vs 82.9%, respectively; P=0.57), while the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 80.2% and 78.2% in the NAT and radiotherapy groups, respectively (P=0.25). Most importantly, both groups had similar local recurrence rates: 8 (12.1%) in the NAT group and 9 (13.2%) in the radiotherapy group (P=0.82). Multivariant analyses showed that the only independent risk factor for recurrence was tumor size >= 4 cm with a hazard ratio of 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.12-5.24; P=0.02). Conclusion Adjuvant treatment improved neither DFS nor local recurrence rates.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage302en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-7292en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85083767578en_US
dc.identifier.startpage298en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/6123
dc.identifier.volume149en_US
dc.identifier.wos000527379400001en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/ijgo.13147en_US
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdjuvant treatmenten_US
dc.subjectDisease-free survivalen_US
dc.subjectEarly-stage cervical canceren_US
dc.subjectIntermediate risk factorsen_US
dc.subjectLocal recurrenceen_US
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen_US
dc.titleComparison of no adjuvant treatment and radiotherapy in early-stage cervical carcinoma with intermediate risk factorsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: