Microperimetry, Humphrey field analyzer, and optical coherence tomography in detecting glaucoma: a comparative performance study

dc.contributor.authorAkar, Serpil
dc.contributor.authorTekeli, Oya
dc.contributor.authorOzturker, Zeynep Kayaarasi
dc.contributor.pubmedID35023012en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-11T09:09:17Z
dc.date.available2022-11-11T09:09:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractPurpose To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of microperimetry (MP), visual field (VF) 10-2 and 24-2 tests, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods The study consisted of 35 POAG and 42 control eyes were enrolled in this prospective study. Eligible participants were >= 50 years old. VF assessments were carried out using the Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) and Macular Integrity Assessment. Optic nerve head (ONH), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), and ganglion cell inner-plexiform-layer thickness (GCIPLT) were measured by SD-OCT. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and sensitivities at 95% specificity were calculated for each parameter. Results HFA 24-2 had the largest AUC value among the functional parameters to differentiate POAG from control eyes [AUC: 0.950 (0.906-0.994), sensitivity at 95%:60]. HFA 24-2 showed a significantly better performance than the 10-2 test (p = 0.036). Among the SD-OCT structural parameters, minimum GCIPLT had the largest AUC value to differentiate POAG from control eyes [AUC: 0.952 (0.905-0.999), sensitivity at 95%:80]. In comparison of the functional and structural parameters, HFA 24-2 showed a significantly better performance than the 10-2 test (p = 0.036). In macular parameters, minimum GCPLT performed significantly better than HFA 10-2 (p = 0.015) in detecting POAG. There was no statistically significant difference between the comparative diagnostic performance of the RNFL, ONH, HFA, and MP (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion The structural and functional test results revealed that GCIPLT measurements had the highest diagnostic performance in detecting POAG. HFA 24-2 test performed better than 10-2 test in distinguishing glaucoma from healthy eyes. MP showed a similar performance with HFA 10-2 and may be considered a complementary diagnostic tool.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2165en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122827301en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2155en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/8064
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.wos000741885600003en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s10792-022-02215-7en_US
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPrimary open-angle glaucomaen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic abilityen_US
dc.subjectStandard automated perimetryen_US
dc.subjectMicroperimetryen_US
dc.subjectOptical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.titleMicroperimetry, Humphrey field analyzer, and optical coherence tomography in detecting glaucoma: a comparative performance studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: