The effect of the use of the Gail model on breast cancer diagnosis in bi-rads 4A cases

dc.contributor.authorKarakaya, Emre
dc.contributor.authorErken, Murathan
dc.contributor.authorTurnaoglu, Hale
dc.contributor.authorSirinoglu, Tugce
dc.contributor.authorAkdur, Aydincan
dc.contributor.authorKavasoglu, Lara
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-0664-5147en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-8726-3369en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-3592-5092en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-3592-5092en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID35677495en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-8219-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAA-3068-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDABI-7217-2020en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDCAA-2756-2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-17T07:15:04Z
dc.date.available2022-06-17T07:15:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjective: The BI-RADS classification system and the Gail Model are the scoring systems that contribute to the diagnosis of breast cancer. The aim of the study was to determine the contribution of Gail Model to the diagnosis of breast lesions that were radiologically categorized as BI-RADS 4A. Material and Methods: We retrospectively examined the medical records of 320 patients between January 2011 and December 2020 whose lesions had been categorized as BI-RADS 4A. Radiological parameters of breast lesions and clinical parameters according to the Gail Model were collected. The relationship between malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions and radiological and clinical parameters was evaluated. In addition, the effect of the Gail Model on diagnosis in malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions was evaluated. Results: Among radiological features, there were significant differences between lesion size, contour, microcalcification content, echogenicity, and presence of ectasia with respect to the pathological diagnosis (p< 0.05). No significant difference was found between the lesions' pathological diagnosis and the patients' Gail score (p> 0.05). An analysis of the features of the Gail model revealed that there was no significant difference between the age of menarche, age at first live birth, presence of a first-degree relative with breast cancer, and a history of breast biopsy and the pathological diagnosis (p> 0.05). Conclusion: As a conclusion Gail Model does not contribute to the diagnosis of BC, especially in patients with BI-RADS 4A lesions.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage399en_US
dc.identifier.issn2564-6850en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124294817en_US
dc.identifier.startpage394en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://turkjsurg.com/full-text-pdf/1817/eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/7053
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wos000753013100014en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5436en_US
dc.relation.journalTURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBreast canceren_US
dc.subjectbreast ultrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectbreast tumorsen_US
dc.titleThe effect of the use of the Gail model on breast cancer diagnosis in bi-rads 4A casesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
eng.pdf
Size:
145.45 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: