Incidence of Urinary Complications With Double J Stents in Kidney Transplantation

dc.contributor.authorKirnap, Mahir
dc.contributor.authorBoyvat, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorTorgay, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorMoray, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorHaberal, Mehmet
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-3300en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-7287en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-4315en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-7632en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID30777542en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAH-9198-2019en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDF-4230-2011en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-5221-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAE-1041-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAF-4610-2019en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-8097-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-29T10:20:41Z
dc.date.available2023-08-29T10:20:41Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Ureteral complications remain a major source of morbidity and occasional mortality in renal transplant. Among all ureteral complications, leaks are the most frequently encountered in the early posttransplant period. The routine use of a double-J ureteric stent remains controversial, with reported increased incidence of urinary tract infection. Here, we retrospectively compared the efficacy of a double J stent in kidney transplant patients to investigate ureteral complication incidence in our center. Materials and Methods: Our study included 382 kidney transplant patients. At 5 weeks after transplant, the double J stent was removed under sedation. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 125 patients with double J stent placement (group 1) and 257 patients without double J stent placement (group 2). Results: We observed no significant demographic differences between the 2 groups with regard to patient age (median patient age of 30 y [range, 2-73 y] for group 1; median patient age of 33 y [range, 4-69 y] for group 2), patient sex (30.2% females in group 1, 32.4% females in group 2), and body mass index (median of 25.1 vs 24.9 kg/m 2 in groups 1 and 2, respectively). Cold and warm ischemia time for donor organ, delayed graft function, and episodes of acute rejection did not differ significantly between the groups. Urinary tract infection was observed in 25/125 (20.4%) and 50/257 patients (19.2%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Urinary leak was present in 8/125 group 1 (6.4%) and 6/257 group 2 patients (2.3%). Conclusions: A double J stent in ureteral anastomosis was not likely to decrease the frequency of leakage but is likely to reduce the gravity of the complication and the need for reoperation. In addition, the use of a double J stent was not associated with increased urinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage152en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0855en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85061871821en_US
dc.identifier.startpage148en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/10459
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wos000463943200026en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.6002/ect.MESOT2018.P14en_US
dc.relation.journalEXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRenal transplanten_US
dc.subjectUrinary leaksen_US
dc.subjectUrinary tract infectionen_US
dc.titleIncidence of Urinary Complications With Double J Stents in Kidney Transplantationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: