Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study

dc.contributor.authorTopkan, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Yurday
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Ozan Cem
dc.contributor.authorKucuk, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorBesen, Ali Ayberk
dc.contributor.authorMertsoylu, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorSezen, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorAkdemir, Eyub Yasar
dc.contributor.authorSezer, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorBolukbasi, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorPehlivan, Berrin
dc.contributor.authorSelek, Ugur
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-1932-9784en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-6908-3412en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-2218-2074en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-6445-1439en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-8120-7123en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-7862-0192en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID32952557en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDM-9530-2014en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAC-5654-2020en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAG-5629-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAD-2667-2020en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAG-2213-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAD-6910-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-13T19:45:59Z
dc.date.available2021-05-13T19:45:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground. We retrospectively compared the incidence of isolated elective nodal failure (IENF) and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus involved-field RT (IFRT) by employing the propensity score matching (PSM) methodology in stage IIIB/C inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT).Methods. Our PSM examination included 1048 stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients treated with C-CRT from January 2007 to December 2016: a total dose of 66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy and 1-3 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy concurrently. The primary and secondary endpoints were the IENF and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after ENI versus IFRT, respectively. Propensity scores were calculated for each group to adjust for confounding variables and facilitate well-balanced comparability by creating 1 : 1 matched study groups.Results. The median follow-up was 26.4 months for the whole study accomplice. The PSM analysis unveiled 1 : 1 matched 646 patients for the ENI (N = 323) and IFRT (N = 323) cohorts. Intergroup comparisons discovered that the 5-year isolated ENF incidence rates (3.4% versus 4.3%;P=0.52) and median overall survival (25.2 versus 24.6 months;P=0.69), locoregional progression-free survival (15.3 versus 15.1 months;P=0.52), and progression-free survival (11.7 versus 11.2 months;P=0.57) durations were similar between the ENI and IFRT cohorts, separately. However, acute grade 3-4 leukopenia (P=0.0012), grade 3 nausea-vomiting (P=0.006), esophagitis (P=0.003), pneumonitis (P=0.002), late grade 3-4 esophageal toxicity (P=0.038), and the need for hospitalization (P<0.001) were all significantly higher in the ENI than in the IFRT group, respectively.Conclusion. Results of the present large-scale PSM cohort established the absence of meaningful IENF or survival differences between the IFRT and ENI cohorts and, consequently, counseled the IFRT as the elected RT technique for such patients since ENI increased the toxicity rates.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1687-8450en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091414533en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.hindawi.com/journals/jo/2020/7083149/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5835
dc.identifier.wos000573041600003en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1155/2020/7083149en_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ONCOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject3D-CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPYen_US
dc.subjectCONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPYen_US
dc.subjectRADIATION-THERAPYen_US
dc.subjectPHASE-IIIen_US
dc.subjectCANCERen_US
dc.subjectFAILUREen_US
dc.subjectIMRTen_US
dc.subjectESOPHAGITISen_US
dc.subjectCOMBINATIONen_US
dc.subjectMETASTASISen_US
dc.titleComparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
7083149.pdf
Size:
1.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: