Prevalence of Split Nerve Fiber Layer Bundles in Healthy People Imaged with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

dc.contributor.authorGungor, Sirel Gur
dc.contributor.authorAkman, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorSezenoz, Almila Sarıgul
dc.contributor.authorTanriasik, Gulsah
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-6178-8362en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-7030-5454en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID28050324en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAD-5967-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-4860-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-18T09:49:23Z
dc.date.available2019-06-18T09:49:23Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The presence of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) split bundles was recently described in normal eyes scanned using scanning laser polarimetry and by histologic studies. Split bundles may resemble RNFL loss in healthy eyes. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of nerve fiber layer split bundles in healthy people. Materials and Methods: We imaged 718 eyes of 359 healthy persons with the spectral domain optical coherence tomography in this cross-sectional study. All eyes had intraocular pressure of 21 mmHg or less, normal appearance of the optic nerve head, and normal visual fields (Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 full threshold program). In our study, a bundle was defined as 'split' when there is localized defect not resembling a wedge defect in the RNFL deviation map with a symmetrically divided RNFL appearance on the RNFL thickness map. The classification was performed by two independent observers who used an identical set of reference examples to standardize the classification. Results: Inter-observer consensus was reached in all cases. Bilateral superior split bundles were seen in 19 cases (5.29%) and unilateral superior split was observed in 15 cases (4.16%). In 325 cases (90.52%) there was no split bundle. Conclusion: Split nerve fiber layer bundles, in contrast to single nerve fiber layer bundles, are not common findings in healthy eyes. In eyes with normal optic disc appearance, especially when a superior RNFL defect is observed in RNFL deviation map, the RNLF thickness map and graphs should also be examined for split nerve fiber layer bundles.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage276en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0659
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85007487795en_US
dc.identifier.startpage274en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cms.galenos.com.tr/Uploads/Article_13667/274-276-ing.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/3590
dc.identifier.volume46en_US
dc.identifier.wos000393281800005en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4274/tjo.49358en_US
dc.relation.journalTURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRetinal nerve fiber layeren_US
dc.subjectSplit nerve fiber layer bundlesen_US
dc.subjectOptical coherence tomographyen_US
dc.titlePrevalence of Split Nerve Fiber Layer Bundles in Healthy People Imaged with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomographyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
274-276-ing.pdf
Size:
122.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: