MLPA Method does not Always Confirm the Results of aCGH: A Study of KANSL1 Gene Deletion Patients

dc.contributor.authorDincer, Selin Akad
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Zerrin Yilmaz
dc.contributor.authorErol, Ilknur
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Feride Iffet
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAC-8356-2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-28T11:46:28Z
dc.date.available2022-11-28T11:46:28Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: Microdeletion and microduplications are detected on chromosomes as a pathological subgroup of copy number variants of DNA. It has become easierto identify such chromosomal syndromes after use of array-based comparative genomic hybridization technology. One of them is the 17q21.31 microdeletion and microduplication syndrome. A 500-650 kb sized copy loss on 17q21.31 results in a phenotype which was described as Koolen-de Vries Syndrome including mental retardation, epilepsia, hypotonia and characteristic facial features. Today, we know that haplo-insufficiency of KANSL1 gene located in this region is responsible for these findings. A total of 30 patients with KANSL1 deletion detected during aCGH analyses were enrolled in the current study. All patients were analyzed by Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplication (MLPA) method in order to confirm the results. Results: Three of the 30 patients had KANSL1 gene deletion detected by both methods and duplication was found in one patient. Conclusion: As a result of the study, we concluded that although new generation molecular methods enable us to obtain big and valuable data, each method has its own limitations and confirming the reults with another method increases test reliability. Using together of these methods are useful for the geneticists during diagnosis, clinical assessment and genetic counseling of patients.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage170en_US
dc.identifier.issn2147-2092en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129248043en_US
dc.identifier.startpage163en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://medicaljournal.gazi.edu.tr/index.php/GMJ/article/view/3374/2555
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/8164
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wos000773358500009en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.12996/gmj.2022.37en_US
dc.relation.journalGAZI MEDICAL JOURNALen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectaCGHen_US
dc.subjectCNVen_US
dc.subjectKANSL1en_US
dc.subjectKdVsen_US
dc.subjectMLPAen_US
dc.subject17q21.31en_US
dc.titleMLPA Method does not Always Confirm the Results of aCGH: A Study of KANSL1 Gene Deletion Patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
65.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: