A Different Approach for Usage of the Implant Materials: The Composite Graft Prefabrication

dc.contributor.authorDeniz, Lutfi Murat
dc.contributor.authorAtaman, Murat Gorkem
dc.contributor.authorBorman, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorErinanc, Hilal
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1401-6356en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID27763981en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAL-1268-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-22T10:32:56Z
dc.date.available2023-06-22T10:32:56Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractWith all implanted materials, a certain sequence of biological events occurs following the implantation. This process is destructive to the implant and peri-implant tissues. The aforementioned sequence of biological events may be responsible for the complications. In this study, the natural biologic process following implantation was completed in an area other than the final implantation area. The aim was to keep the peri-implant tissues in the final implantation area away from the process. In the control group, the porous polyethylene discs were implanted to subcutaneous area on the frontal bone of the rats. A month after the implantation, macroscopic and microscopic examinations were performed. In the study group, the discs were implanted primarily above the rectus abdominis muscle of the rats. It was named as the composite graft prefabrication. Twenty-one days after the first implantation, the discs were removed from the rectus muscle and implanted to subcutaneous area on the frontal bone of the rats. A month after the final implantation, macroscopic and microscopic examinations were performed. In macroscopic examination, all possible complications were evaluated. In microscopic examination, apoptosis, fibrosis, inflammation, and fibrovascular in-growing were evaluated. In the control group, implant exposure was observed in 3 of the rats. In the study group, no complications were observed. Although there was no statistical difference between 2 groups in the microscopic findings, at first glance, the inflammation seemed to be the factor responsible for the complication in the control group. According to the macroscopic results, the composite graft prefabrication seemed to be effective in preventing complications.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1898en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85018550599en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1896en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/9779
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wos000386352100124en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SCS.0000000000002938en_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectForeign body reactionen_US
dc.subjectimplanted materialsen_US
dc.subjectporous polyethyleneen_US
dc.titleA Different Approach for Usage of the Implant Materials: The Composite Graft Prefabricationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: