Current status of laparoscopic surgery usage in Turkiye: A middle-income country

dc.contributor.authorEsmer, Ahmet Cem
dc.contributor.authorColak, Tahsin
dc.contributor.authorEdizsoy, Akay
dc.contributor.authorTazeoglu, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorKaraca, Ahmet Serdar
dc.contributor.pubmedID36875273en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-13T12:53:32Z
dc.date.available2023-09-13T12:53:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to determine the usage status of laparoscopic procedures in general surgical practice in Turkiye, which is a sample of middle-income countries. Material and Methods: The questionnaire was sent to general surgeons, gastrointestinal surgeons, and surgical oncologists who have completed their residency training and are actively working in university, public or private hospitals. Demographic data, laparoscopy training and the period of education, the rate of laparoscopy use, the type and volume of laparoscopic surgical procedures, their views on the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery, and the reasons for preferring laparoscopy were determined with a 30-item questionnaire. Results: Two hundred and forty-four questionnaires from 55 different cities of Turkiye were evaluated. The responders were mainly males, younger surgeons (F/M=11.1/88.9 % and 30-39 y/o), and graduated from the university hospital residence program (56.6%). Laparoscopic training was frequently taken during residency (77.5%) in the younger age group, while the elderly participants mostly received additional training after specialization (91.7%). Laparoscopic surgery was mostly not available in public hospitals for advanced procedures (p< 0.0001) but was available for cholecystectomy and appendectomy operations (p=NS). However, participants working in university hospitals mostly stated that the laparoscopic approach was the first choice for advanced procedures. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the surgeons working in MICs spent strong effort to use laparoscopy in daily practice, especially in university and high-volume hospitals. However, inappropriate education, cost of laparoscopic equipment, healthcare policies, and some cultural and social barriers might have negatively impacted the widespread use of laparoscopic surgery and its usage in daily practice in MICs such as Turkiye.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2564-7032en_US
dc.identifier.endpage361en_US
dc.identifier.issn2564-6850en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85146296212en_US
dc.identifier.startpage353en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9979558/pdf/TJS-38-353.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/10631
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wos000946255400006en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5713en_US
dc.relation.journalTURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopy trainingen_US
dc.subjectquestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectresidencyen_US
dc.titleCurrent status of laparoscopic surgery usage in Turkiye: A middle-income countryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ae20.pdf
Size:
341.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: