Use of Cardiac Imaging in Chronic Coronary Syndromes: The EURECA Imaging Registry

dc.contributor.authorSade, Leyla Elif
dc.contributor.pubmedID36452988en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-29T10:59:17Z
dc.date.available2024-03-29T10:59:17Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground The prospective, multicentre EURECA registry assessed the use of imaging and adoption of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines (GL) in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). Methods Between May 2019 and March 2020, 5156 patients were recruited in 73 centres from 24 ESC member countries. The adoption of GL recommendations was evaluated according to clinical presentation and pre-test probability (PTP) of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Results The mean age of the population was 64 11 years, 60% of patients were males, 42% had PTP >15%, 27% had previous CAD, and ejection fraction was <50% in 5%. Exercise ECG was performed in 32% of patients, stress imaging as the first choice in 40%, and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in 22%. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was the first or downstream test in 17% and 11%, respectively. Obstructive CAD was documented in 24% of patients, inducible ischaemia in 19%, and 13% of patients underwent revascularization. In 44% of patients, the overall diagnostic process did not adopt the GL. In these patients, referral to stress imaging (21% vs. 58%; P < 0.001) or CTCA (17% vs. 30%; P < 0.001) was less frequent, while exercise ECG (43% vs. 22%; P < 0.001) and ICA (48% vs. 15%; P < 0.001) were more frequently performed. The adoption of GL was associated with fewer ICA, higher proportion of diagnosis of obstructive CAD (60% vs. 39%, P < 0.001) and revascularization (54% vs. 37%, P < 0.001), higher quality of life, fewer additional testing, and longer times to late revascularization. Conclusions In patients with CCS, current clinical practice does not adopt GL recommendations on the use of diagnostic tests in a significant proportion of patients. When the diagnostic approach adopts GL recommendations, invasive procedures are less frequently used and the diagnostic yield and therapeutic utility are superior. [GRAPHICS]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0195-668Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148341576en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/11970
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wos001180102200002en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/eurheartj/ehac640en_US
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN HEART JOURNALen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCoronary artery diseaseen_US
dc.subjectChronic coronary syndromesen_US
dc.subjectImagingen_US
dc.titleUse of Cardiac Imaging in Chronic Coronary Syndromes: The EURECA Imaging Registryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ehac640.pdf
Size:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: