Predictiveness of different preoperative risk assessments for postoperative bleeding after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

dc.contributor.authorGunertem, Eren
dc.contributor.authorUrcun, Salim
dc.contributor.authorPala, Arda Aybars
dc.contributor.authorBudak, Ali Baran
dc.contributor.authorErcisli, Murat Abdulhamid
dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, Serdar
dc.contributor.pubmedID32659163en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-31T08:29:40Z
dc.date.available2021-05-31T08:29:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractAim: Postoperative bleeding is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Studies have been conducted, and guidelines have been published regarding patient blood management and aiming to prevent blood loss in the perioperative period. Various bleeding risk assessments were developed for preoperative period. We aimed to examine the correlations of scoring systems in the literature with the amount of postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing first time coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and to show the most suitable preoperative bleeding risk assessment for coronary artery bypass graft patients. Methods: The study included 550 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft operation. The inclusion criteria were considered as patients to be older than 18 years old and to undergo elective or emergent myocardial revascularization using cardiopulmonary bypass. All variables required for scoring systems were recorded. The initial results of the study were determined as the amount of chest tube drainage, the use of blood products, the change in hematocrit level, reoperation due to bleeding, duration of ventilation, duration of intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. Mortality which occurred during first 30 days after operation was considered as operative mortality. Operative mortality was accepted as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were massive bleeding and high amount of transfusion. Results: Data were obtained from a series of 550 consecutive patients treated with isolated coronary artery bypass graft. It was seen that PAPWORTH and WILL-BLEED risk assessments responded better for E-CABG grade 2 and 3 bleeding compared to other risk assessments. TRACK, TRUST, and ACTA-PORT scales were found to have low ability to distinguish patients with E-CABG bleeding grade 2 and 3. Conclusion: Predicting postoperative bleeding and transfusion rates with preoperative risk scores in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery will provide valuable information to physicians for establishing a proper patient blood management protocol and this will decrease excessive transfusions, unnecessary reoperations as well as improve postoperative outcomes.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage284en_US
dc.identifier.issn0267-6591en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087765947en_US
dc.identifier.startpage277en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5948
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.wos000548553400001en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/0267659120941327en_US
dc.relation.journalPERFUSION-UKen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectbleedingen_US
dc.subjectcoronary artery bypass graftingen_US
dc.subjectbleeding risk assessmenten_US
dc.titlePredictiveness of different preoperative risk assessments for postoperative bleeding after coronary artery bypass grafting surgeryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: