Interventional Treatment Methods for Ureteral Complications After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Experience

dc.contributor.authorOzen, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorKarakaya, Emre
dc.contributor.authorZeydanli, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorBoyvat, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorHaberal, Mehmet
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-4879-7974en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-7122-4130en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID37698400en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAD-5466-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDF-4230-2011en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAN-1681-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T11:05:54Z
dc.date.available2024-07-31T11:05:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Ureteral complications are one of the most common complications after kidney transplant. Although these complications have been treated surgically in the past, almost all can be successfully treated with interventional methods today. In this study, we assessed the interventional treatment of ureteral complications after kidney transplants performed in our center and the long-term results of these treatments. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 2223 kidney transplant recipients seen between January 1, 2000, and May 1, 2020. Among these, 70 kidney transplant recipients who experienced ureteral leakage or ureteral obstruction in the early or late posttransplant period were included in the study. Complications within the first 2 months posttransplant were classified as early complications, whereas those occurring after 2 months were considered late complications. We treated all patients with interventional methods.Results: In review of patients, 44 patients were diagnosed with ureteral obstruction (22 patients were early obstruction, 22 were late obstruction) and 26 patients with ureteral anastomosis leakage. All patients with early and late ureteral obstruction were successfully treated with percutaneous methods. In the group of patients with ureteral leakage, all patients except 2 patients were treated with interventional methods. For 2 patients with ureteral leakage, surgical treatment was necessary because of persistent leakage despite percutaneous treatment methods. Conclusions: Ureteral complications after kidney transplant can be successfully treated with interventional methods in experienced centers without the need for surgery.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2146-8427en_US
dc.identifier.endpage663en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0855en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85170630653en_US
dc.identifier.startpage657en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/12185
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wos001081963500006en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.6002/ect.2023.0236en_US
dc.relation.journalEXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNephrostomyen_US
dc.subjectStrictureen_US
dc.subjectUreterostomyen_US
dc.titleInterventional Treatment Methods for Ureteral Complications After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: