Long-Term Social Outcomes of Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: Transition From Childhood to Adulthood

dc.contributor.authorKarakaya, Emre
dc.contributor.authorErdogan, Ulascan
dc.contributor.authorSaban, Sevval
dc.contributor.authorTeksam, Buse
dc.contributor.authorSan, Aydin
dc.contributor.authorOzcay, Figen
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorHaberal, Mehmet
dc.contributor.pubmedID38263781en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T11:56:42Z
dc.date.available2024-03-25T11:56:42Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Chronic disorders may negatively affect people's learning status, marital status, occupational life, and social life. Liver transplant is the only curative treatment for chronic liver diseases. This study was undertaken to evaluate the psychosocial effects of liver transplant in adult patients who had undergone liver transplant during the pediatric period compared with psychosocial facts in the general population. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients (>18 years of age) who had received liver transplant as children. We compared sex, age at the time of transplant, current age, type of donor, graft survival status, marital status, age at first delivery, number of children, educational status, and occupational status in the study population versus the general (normal) population. To compare the liver transplant patients included in the study with the general population correctly, we used data from the Turkish Statistical Institute. Results: Among 77 liver transplant patients included in our study, the mean age at transplant was 10.9 years (range, 0.5-16 y) and the mean age at the time of the study was 25.2 years (range, 18-42 y). Of the patients, 61 (79.2%) were single and 16 (20.8%) were married. Patients in the study population married at a younger age than the general population (25.5 vs 28.1 y for men, 24.3 vs 25.4 y for women). Of 16 married patients, 9 (56.2%) had a healthy child or children. The percentage of patients who graduated from higher education or were continuing their higher education process was higher in our study population than in the general population (36.3% vs 22.8%). Among our study population, 37 patients (48%) were workers. Conclusions: Liver transplant had no negative effects on the social, educational, and professional lives among adults in our study who received transplants in the pediatric period.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn2146-8427en_US
dc.identifier.endpage951en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0855en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85183336935en_US
dc.identifier.startpage946en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/11934
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wos001171683700004en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.6002/ect.2023.0140en_US
dc.relation.journalEXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectChronic liver diseaseen_US
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.subjectPhysical healthen_US
dc.subjectSocial lifeen_US
dc.titleLong-Term Social Outcomes of Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: Transition From Childhood to Adulthooden_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: