Association Between Panel Reactive Antibody and Antiendothelial Cell Antibody Positivity in Kidney Transplant Patients

dc.contributor.authorBasturk, Bilkay
dc.contributor.authorKantaroglu, Bircan
dc.contributor.authorNoyan, Z. Aytul
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorSariturk, Cagla
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-8784-1974en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-5735-4315en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-4130-1059en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID25894170en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAD-6918-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAF-4610-2019en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAS-7129-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-12T10:36:31Z
dc.date.available2024-02-12T10:36:31Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Endothelium is the major tissue for hyperacute and acute rejection. Binding of antibody to endothelium activates several immunologic mechanisms. Antiendothelial cell antibodies are a group of nonhuman leukocyte antigen antibodies that may play a role in the induction of an immunologic reaction that triggers inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there was an association between antiendothelial cell antibody positivity and panel reactive antibody positivity in renal transplant patients. Materials and Methods: In this study, we investigated the association between antiendothelial cell antibodies and panel reactive antibody Class I class II crossmatch positivity in patients, and compared these results with results from 100 healthy volunteers. All serum samples were analyzed by bead-based technology for calculated panel reactive antibody positivity; in addition, slides were used, each containing human umbilical vein endothelial cells and capillary-rich tissue for antiendothelial cell antibody positivity. Results: Antiendothelial cell antibodies was positive in 48 of 89 patients (panel reactive antibody Class I class II negative), 22 of 35 patients (class l-positive), 25 of 39 patients (class II-positive), 26 of 40 (class I-class II positive), and 37 of 57 serologic and flow cytometry crossmatch-positive patients (P <= .016), and ultimately, in 122 of 205 patients and 25 of 100 volunteers (P <= .001). Antiendothelial cell antibody positivity was more frequent in panel reactive antibody-positive than negative patients and the control group. Conclusions: Binding of antiendothelial cell antibodies to endothelial cells may activate complement by the classical pathway and cause up-regulation of adhesion molecules. This study questioned the antigenic specificity of antiendothelial cell antibodies. Our study results showed that antiendothelial cell antibodies may play an important role for graft destruction, independent of panel reactive antibody and crossmatch positivity.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage272en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0855en_US
dc.identifier.issueSupplement 1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84939808936en_US
dc.identifier.startpage269en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/11475
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wos000355058400054en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.6002/ect.mesot2014.P77en_US
dc.relation.journalEXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEnd-stage renal diseaseen_US
dc.subjectHuman leukocyte antigenen_US
dc.subjectNon-HLA antibodyen_US
dc.titleAssociation Between Panel Reactive Antibody and Antiendothelial Cell Antibody Positivity in Kidney Transplant Patientsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: