Left atrial strain is a predictor of left ventricular systolic and diastolic reverse remodelling in CRT candidates

dc.contributor.authorGalli, Elena
dc.contributor.authorOger, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorAalen, John M.
dc.contributor.authorDuchenne, Jurgen
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Camilla K.
dc.contributor.authorSade, Elif
dc.contributor.authorHubert, Arnaud
dc.contributor.authorGallard, Aban
dc.contributor.authorPenicka, Martin
dc.contributor.authorLinde, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorLe Rolle, Virginie
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Alfredo
dc.contributor.authorLeclercq, Christophe
dc.contributor.authorVoig, Jens-Uwe
dc.contributor.authorSmiseth, Otto A.
dc.contributor.authorDonal, Erwan
dc.contributor.pubmedID34432006en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-16T06:43:56Z
dc.date.available2022-06-16T06:43:56Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractAims The left atrium (LA) has a pivotal role in cardiac performance and LA deformation is a well-known prognostic predictor in several clinical conditions including heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on both LA morphology and function and to assess the impact of LA reservoir strain (LARS) on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic remodelling after CRT. Methods and results Two hundred and twenty-one CRT-candidates were prospectively included in the study in four tertiary centres and underwent echocardiography before CRT-implantation and at 6-month follow-up (FU). CRT-response was defined by a 15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume. LV systolic and diastolic remodelling were defined as the percent reduction in LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volume at FU. Indexed LA volume (LAVI) and LV-global longitudinal (GLS) strain were the main parameters correlated with LARS, with LV-GLS being the strongest determinant of LARS (r = -0.59, P < 0.0001). CRT induced a significant improvement in LAVI and LARS in responders (both P < 0.0001). LARS was an independent predictor of both LV systolic and diastolic remodelling at follow-up (r = -0.14, P = 0.049 and r = -0.17, P = 0.002, respectively). Conclusion CRT induces a significant improvement in LAVI and LARS in responders. In CRT candidates, the evaluation of LARS before CRT delivery is an independent predictor of LV systolic and diastolic remodelling at FU.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2047-2404en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/7040
dc.identifier.wos000756656100001en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/ehjci/jeab163en_US
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGINGen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcardiac resynchronization therapyen_US
dc.subjectheart failureen_US
dc.subjectleft atrial strainen_US
dc.titleLeft atrial strain is a predictor of left ventricular systolic and diastolic reverse remodelling in CRT candidatesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: