Does abnormal ductus venosus pulsatility index at the first-trimester effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes?

dc.contributor.authorBaran, Safak Yilmaz
dc.contributor.authorKalayci, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorDurdag, Gulsen Dogan
dc.contributor.authorYetkinel, Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Alev
dc.contributor.authorKilicdag, Esra Bulgan
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-2165-9168en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-5064-5267en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-0942-9108en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-4444-0027en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-5874-7324en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID32623067en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAL-1530-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAI-9594-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAK-8872-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDV-1112-2019en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-19T08:26:14Z
dc.date.available2021-04-19T08:26:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractAim: The ductus venosus pulsatility index for veins (DV PIV) has become a popular marker of the first-trimester scan. The aim of this study is to search for any difference between groups with normal and abnormal DV PIV values in terms of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 556 women whose first-trimester scan was performed. The ductus venosus pulsatility indices were examined at singleton pregnancies between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation. Patients were categorized as Group-I with normal DV PIV (DV PIV >= 0.73, <= 1.22) and as Group-II with abnormal DV PIV. Group-II was subgrouped as Group-IIA which composed of patients with DV PIV < 0.73 and as Group-IIB with DV PIV > 1.22. Results: There were 451 subjects in Group-I and 105 subjects in Group-II (Group-IIA = 32 and Group-IIB 73). The comparisons between major groups revealed a statistically significant increase about miscarriage (p = 0.002), stillbirth (p < 0.001), small for gestational age (p = 0.033), low birth weight (p < 0.001), fetal growth restriction (p = 0.048), and major congenital heart defect (p=<0.001) in Group-II. This difference is mainly due to Group-IIB. There is no difference in preterm delivery, preeclampsia and gestational diabetes between Group I and II. Conclusion: Routinely monitoring DIV PIV as a first-trimester screening should provide valuable information regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriage, stillbirth, small for gestational age, low birth weight, fetal growth restriction and major congenital heart defect. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2468-7847en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087709477en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5711
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.wos000583846900016en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101851en_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject1st trimester ultrasound screening for aneuploidy and anomaliesen_US
dc.subjectDoppler-diagnosticen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic ultrasound and prenatal diagnosisen_US
dc.titleDoes abnormal ductus venosus pulsatility index at the first-trimester effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: