Case Reports: Should We Do Away with Them?

dc.contributor.authorFirat, Aynur Camkiran
dc.contributor.authorAraz, Coskun
dc.contributor.authorKayhan, Zeynep
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-4927-6660en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-0579-1115en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-1470-7501en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID28235534en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-4576-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-4623-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-21T07:39:31Z
dc.date.available2023-07-21T07:39:31Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractStudy objective: There has been a gradual decline in the number of case reports published in leading medical journals in recent years. Since case reports are not highly cited they have an adverse effect on the journal impact factor. On the other hand sharing new experiences, challenges, or discoveries with colleagues is essential for medical community. Should case reports be eliminated from the journals or published only in journals devoted to case reports? Design: Observational study. Setting: Web of Science database was searched, between 2005 and 2009, with terms: "anesthesia", "anesthesiology" and "case report" yielding 25 969, 9532, and 661 publications, respectively. Since some reports contained large number of cases, only those involving up to three cases (n = 425) were evaluated by the authors with respect to their type, contribution to knowledge and/or practice (Likert scale) and times they were cited. Main results: Distribution of answers to the statement "Case has added to my knowledge and/or improved my practice" was; 3% (strongly disagree), 10.5% (disagree), 33.2% (neither agree nor disagree), 39.3% (agree) and 13.7% (strongly agree). Average citations per item was 4.43 (1883/425), 7.32 (4838/661), and 7.82 (74 529/ 9532). As to the types of the reports; 50% unexpected event in the course of anesthesia, 31% unusual and instructive cases, 9.6% novel/unique anesthetic techniques, 6% novel use of equipment, 1.6% new information on diseases of importance to anesthesiology and 1% scientific observations. Conclusion: Case reports have been an important source of clinical guidance and scientific insight, and play an important role in medical education. They can be published quickly, providing publication opportunity for juniors and for clinicians who may not have the time or finance to conduct large-scale research. On the other hand some argue, that case reports are irrelevant in current medical practice and education, being at the bottom of the hierarchical ladder of medical evidence. We conclude that case reports should not be done away with but be published in websites and journals like the venue to be launched in 2013 by the International Anesthesia Research Society, devoted entirely to them to meet the need for the publication of interesting cases. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4529en_US
dc.identifier.endpage76en_US
dc.identifier.issn0952-8180en_US
dc.identifier.startpage74en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/10031
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wos000395965200016en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.006en_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIAen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectJournalen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectCaseen_US
dc.subjectCase reporten_US
dc.subjectCase seriesen_US
dc.titleCase Reports: Should We Do Away with Them?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: