Significance of liver metastasis volume in breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

dc.contributor.authorOymak, Ezgi
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Ozan Cem
dc.contributor.authorOnal, Cem
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-2742-9021en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID34477885en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAGG-9214-2022en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDD-5195-2014en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T08:21:02Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T08:21:02Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose This study analyzed the impact of liver metastasis (LM) volume on treatment outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods This single-institution retrospective analysis included 40 oligometastatic (<= 5 metastases) BC patients with 58 liver metastases treated with SBRT between April 2013 and March 2021. The prognostic factors for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were assessed. Results Median follow-up time was 28.1 months. Isolated and solitary LM were seen in 26 (65%) and 24 (60%) patients, respectively. Median time to disease recurrence was 10.7 months post liver SBRT. The 2-year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 71.4%, 27.5%, and 86.8%, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with a gross tumor volume (GTV) of <= 6 cc and a planning target volume (PTV) of <= 38 cc demonstrated a significantly better median OS than those with GTV > 6 cc and PTV > 38 cc. In multivariate analysis, the predictive factors for worse OS were GTV > 6 cc (HR = 3.07 [95% CI, 1.14-8.22; p = 0.03]) and PTV > 38 cc (HR = 5.91 [95% CI, 1.92-18.21; p = 0.002]). No significant factor for PFS was found. Only 2 patients experienced rib fracture at 4 and 6 months post treatment, and 1 patient had a grade II duodenal ulcer. Conclusion Liver SBRT is an effective and safe treatment option for oligometastatic BC patients with excellent LC, promising survival, and limited toxicity. Patients with smaller tumors displayed better OS than their counterparts, validating the effectiveness of a local treatment for this group.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage253en_US
dc.identifier.issn0179-7158en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85114143114en_US
dc.identifier.startpage247en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/7392
dc.identifier.volume198en_US
dc.identifier.wos000692301100002en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00066-021-01845-7en_US
dc.relation.journalSTRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBreast canceren_US
dc.subjectLiver metastasisen_US
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectStereotactic radiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectStereotactic ablative body radiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectTumor volumeen_US
dc.titleSignificance of liver metastasis volume in breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: