Retrospective evaluation of viral respiratory tract infections in a university hospital in Ankara, Turkey (2016-2019)

dc.contributor.authorAltay-Kocak, Aylin
dc.contributor.authorSarzhanova, Shakhnoza
dc.contributor.authorTapisiz, Anil
dc.contributor.authorDizbay, Murat
dc.contributor.authorBasustaoglu, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorBozdayi, Gulendam
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-0451-0142en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID35656958en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAI-8012-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T12:53:50Z
dc.date.available2022-12-14T12:53:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Viruses are responsible for two-thirds of all acute respiratory tract infections. This study aims to retrospectively detect respiratory tract viruses in patients from all age groups who visited the hospital. Methodology: A total of 1592 samples from 1416 patients with respiratory tract symptoms were sent from several clinics to the Molecular Microbiology Laboratory at Gazi University Hospital from February 2016 to January 2019. Nucleic acid extraction from nasopharyngeal swabs, throat swabs or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples sent to our laboratory was done using a commercial automated system. Extracted nucleic acids were amplified by a commercial multiplex-real time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method, which can detect 18 viral respiratory pathogens. Results: Among 1592 samples, 914 (57.4%) were positive for respiratory viruses. The most prevalent were rhinovirus (25.2%) and influenza A virus (12.1%), the least prevalent was the bocavirus (2.6%). Rhinovirus was the most detected as a single agent (21.2%, 194/914) among all positive cases, followed by coronavirus (9.3%, 85/914). The detection rates of coronavirus, human adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus A/B, human parainfluenza viruses, human metapneumovirus-A/B, human parechovirus, enterovirus and influenza B virus were 9.9%, 8%, 7.7%, 5%, 3.4%, 3.1%, 3%, and 2.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The most detected viral agents in our study were influenza A virus and rhinovirus. Laboratory diagnosis of respiratory viruses is helpful to prevent unnecessary antibiotic use and is essential in routine diagnostics for antiviral treatment. Multiplex Real-time PCR method is fast and useful for the diagnosis of viral respiratory infections.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage863en_US
dc.identifier.issn1972-2680en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85131337555en_US
dc.identifier.startpage857en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.jidc.org/index.php/journal/article/view/35656958/2830
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/8299
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wos000808235800017en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3855/jidc.14427en_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIESen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory virusesen_US
dc.subjectrhinovirusen_US
dc.subjectinfluenza virusen_US
dc.subjectcoronavirusen_US
dc.subjectmultiplex real-time PCRen_US
dc.titleRetrospective evaluation of viral respiratory tract infections in a university hospital in Ankara, Turkey (2016-2019)en_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
14427-Article Text-151387-1-10-20220602.pdf
Size:
1.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: