Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500

dc.contributor.authorAkman, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorAsena, Leyla
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Sirel Gur
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-6178-8362en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-6848-203Xen_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID26674777en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAD-5967-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDE-5914-2016en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-22T07:23:35Z
dc.date.available2019-06-22T07:23:35Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractPurpose To compare the measurements and failure rates obtained with a new swept source optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based biometry to IOLMaster 500. Setting Eye Clinic, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. Design Observational cross-sectional study and evaluation of a new diagnostic technology. Methods 188 eyes of 101 subjects were included in the study. Measurements of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal power (K1 and K2) and the measurement failure rate with the new Zeiss IOLMaster 700 were compared with those obtained with the IOLMaster 500. The results were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. The differences between both methods were assessed using the paired samples t test, and their correlation was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results The mean age was 68.3212.71years and the male/female ratio was 29/72. The agreements between two devices were outstanding regarding AL (ICC=1.0), ACD (ICC=0.920), K1 (ICC=0.992) and K2 (ICC=0.989) values. IOLMaster 700 was able to measure ACD AL, K1 and K2 in all eyes within high-quality SD limits of the manufacturer. IOLMaster 500 was able to measure ACD in 175 eyes, whereas measurements were not possible in the remaining 13 eyes. AL measurements were not possible for 17 eyes with IOLMaster 500. Nine of these eyes had posterior subcapsular cataracts and eight had dense nuclear cataracts. Conclusions Although the agreement between the two devices was excellent, the IOLMaster 700 was more effective in obtaining biometric measurements in eyes with posterior subcapsular and dense nuclear cataracts.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1205en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-1161
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84960193765en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1201en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bjo.bmj.com/content/bjophthalmol/100/9/1201.full.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/3678
dc.identifier.volume100en_US
dc.identifier.wos000383290100009en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307779en_US
dc.relation.journalBRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOptics and Refractionen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic testsen_US
dc.subjectInvestigationen_US
dc.titleEvaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1201.full.pdf
Size:
550.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: