Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edema

dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Gursel
dc.contributor.authorAkkoyun, Imren
dc.contributor.authorYazici, Ayse Canan
dc.contributor.pubmedID26086006en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-27T13:05:34Z
dc.date.available2019-11-27T13:05:34Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractAIM: To compare therapeutic effects of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) versus intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections for bilateral diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME). METHODS: Forty eyes of 20 patients with bilateral DDME participated in this study. For each patient, 4 mg/0.1 mL IVTA was injected to one eye and 2.5 mg/0.1 mL IVB was injected to the other eye. The effects of injection for diabetic macular edema (DME) were evaluated using best -corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) by applanation tonometer. Patients underwent eye examinations, including BCVA, CMT, and IOP at pre-injection, 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24wk after injection. During the follow -up, second injections were performed to eyes which have CMT greater than 400 pm at 12wk for salvage therapy. RESULTS: BCVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) at pre -injection, 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24wk after injection was 0.71 +/- 0.19, 0.62 +/- 0.23, 0.63 +/- 0.12, 0.63 +/- 0.13, 0.63 +/- 0.14 and 0.61 +/- 0.24 in the IVTA group and 0.68 +/- 0.25, 0.61 +/- 0.22, 0.60 +/- 0.24, 0.62 +/- 0.25, 0.65 +/- 0.26 and 0.59 +/- 0.25 in the IVB group, respectively. CMT (mu m) at pre-injection, 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24wk after injection was 544 +/- 125, 383 +/- 96, 335 +/- 87, 323 +/- 87, 333 +/- 92, 335 +/- 61 in the IVTA group and 514 +/- 100, 431 +/- 86, 428 +/- 107, 442 +/- 106, 478 +/- 112, 430 +/- 88 in the IVB group respectively. Reduction ratios of mean CMT were 29% at 1wk, 38% at 4wk, 40% at 8wk, 38% at 12wk, and 38% at 24wk in the IVTA group. Second IVTA injections were performed to the 6 eyes (30%) at 12wk. Reduction ratios of mean CMT were 16% at 1wk, 17% at 4wk, 14% at 8wk, 7% at 12wk, and 16% at 24wk in the IVB group. Second IVB injections were performed to the 15 eyes (75%) at 12wk. CONCLUSION: This study showed earlier and more frequent macular edema recurrences in the eyes treated with bevacizumab compared with the ones treated with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide was found to provide more efficient and long-standing effect in terms of reducing CMT compared with the bevacizumab.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage555en_US
dc.identifier.issn2222-3959
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84938854408en_US
dc.identifier.startpage550en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2015/3/20150320.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/4271
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.wos000355781100020en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.03.20en_US
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbevacizumaben_US
dc.subjectdiabetic macular edemaen_US
dc.subjecttriamcinolone acetonideen_US
dc.titleComparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edemaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
20150320.pdf
Size:
303.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: