Analysis of Panel Reactive Antibodies in Renal Transplant Recipients Detected by Luminex: A Single-Center Experience

dc.contributor.authorInal, Ali
dc.contributor.authorOzcelik, Umit
dc.contributor.authorUyanik, Ebru Ogan
dc.contributor.authorKulah, Eyyup
dc.contributor.authorDemirag, Alp
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-0690-2529en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-1073-2494en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-6041-4254en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID26517205en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDJ-8056-2012en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAG-8651-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-5764-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T11:16:24Z
dc.date.available2023-06-16T11:16:24Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The role of panel reactive antibody has gained universal acceptance in solid-organ transplant. This parameter is used to gauge the level of sensitization of prospective solid-organ recipients. More than one-third of patients on wait lists for kidney transplant are sensitized. Most have previously formed donor-specific and non-donor-specific serum antibodies and/or positive crossmatch by complementdependent cytotoxicity and/or flow cytometry. We present the rate of positivity at our institution for human leukocyte antigen antibodies and describe the condensation of antibodies in human leukocyte antigens for renal pretransplant recipients. Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2012, six hundred twenty consecutive renal transplant recipients on the wait list at the Baskent University were evaluated for this retrospective study. Panel reactive antibody screening and definition tests were studied with Luminex assays for the combination of class I (A, B, C) and class II antigens (DR, DQ). Results: We found a panel reactive antibody screening positivity in 20.4% of our patients on renal transplant waiting list. Panel reactive antibody defining tests were meaningful in 12.2% of the whole list. We observed that only panel reactive antibody class I positivity was seen in 2.2%, only panel reactive antibody class II positivity was seen in 2.7%, and both panel reactive antibody class I and class II positivities were seen in 7.2% of the defining tests. Conclusions: The estimated risk of sensitization for patients with a living donor is determined from the combined results of the crossmatch with the donor and those of the recipient's panel reactive and donorspecific antibodies. Compared with complementdependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, Luminex assays provide greater sensitivity and specificity in detection of donor-specific antibodies.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage404en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0855en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84982986526en_US
dc.identifier.startpage401en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/9666
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wos000392952000007en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.6002/ect.2014.0285en_US
dc.relation.journalEXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDonor specific antibodyen_US
dc.subjectSolid-organ transplanten_US
dc.subjectCrossmatchen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of Panel Reactive Antibodies in Renal Transplant Recipients Detected by Luminex: A Single-Center Experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: