Do Probiotics Have A Role in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis? A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

dc.contributor.authorGuvenc, Isil Adadan
dc.contributor.authorMuluk, Nuray Bayar
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Fezan Sahin
dc.contributor.authorEski, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorAltintoprak, Niyazi
dc.contributor.authorOktemer, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorCingi, Cemal
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-4784-3342en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDS-2103-2016en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAD-5458-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAA-1951-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-19T11:52:57Z
dc.date.available2023-06-19T11:52:57Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate clinical evidence for the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods: A systematic search was conducted to review the results of all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. Primary outcome measurements were total nasal and ocular symptom scores (SS) and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires. Secondary outcome measurements were individual nasal SS and immunologic parameters. Results: Twenty-two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were included. Seventeen trials showed significant benefit of probiotics clinically, whereas eight trials showed significant improvement in immunologic parameters compared with placebo. All five studies with Lactobacillus paracasei (LP) strains demonstrated clinically significant improvements compared with placebo. Probiotics showed significant reduction in nasal and ocular SS (standardized mean difference [SMD], -1.23, p < 0.001; and SMD, -1.84, p < 0.001; respectively), total, nasal, and ocular QoL scores compared with placebo (SMD, -1.84, p < 0.001; SMD, -2.30, p = 0.006; and SMD, -3.11, p = 0.005; respectively). Although heterogeneity was high, in subgroup analysis, SMD for total nasal and ocular symptoms with patients with seasonal AR and for nasal QoL scores for studies with LP-33 strain were significant and homogenous. Scores of nasal blockage, rhinorrhea, and nasal itching were significantly lower in the probiotic group compared with placebo. The meta-analysis studies SS the Japanese guidelines revealed a significant, homogenous SMD score of -0.34 for individual nasal SS, above the minimal important clinical difference value of 0.3. The T-helper 1 to T-helper 2 ratio was significantly lower in the probiotic group compared with placebo (SMD, -0.78; p = 0.045). Conclusion: Despite high variability among the studies, synthesis of available data provided significant evidence of beneficial clinical and immunologic effects of probiotics in the treatment of AR, especially with seasonal AR and LP-33 strains. With the rising pool of studies, the most promising strains in specific allergies can be revealed and adjuvant therapy with probiotics can be recommended for the treatment of AR.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1945-8932en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE175en_US
dc.identifier.issn1945-8924en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE157en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/9691
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wos000390854700003en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4354en_US
dc.relation.journalAMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectJAPANESE CEDAR POLLINOSISen_US
dc.subjectPLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALen_US
dc.subjectDUST-SENSITIVE CHILDRENen_US
dc.subjectESCHERICHIA-COLI STRAINen_US
dc.subjectRANDOMIZED-DOUBLE-BLINDen_US
dc.subjectLACTOBACILLUS-PARACASEIen_US
dc.subjectFERMENTED MILKen_US
dc.subjectGRASS-POLLENen_US
dc.subjectCLINICAL-TRIALSen_US
dc.subjectEFFICACYen_US
dc.titleDo Probiotics Have A Role in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis? A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: