Conventional Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: from Acquisition to Precision

dc.contributor.authorKupeli, Elif
dc.contributor.authorSeyfettin, Pinar
dc.contributor.authorTepeoglu, Merih Demirel
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-9894-8005en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-5826-1997en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID25593608en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAK-5222-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAB-5345-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T12:28:59Z
dc.date.available2024-03-07T12:28:59Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (C-TBNA) is a minimally invasive, safe, and cost-effective technique in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Previously we reported that the skills for C-TBNA can be acquired from the books. We studied the learning curve for C-TBNA for a single bronchoscopist at a tertiary-care center where ultrasound technology remains difficult to acquire. METHODS: We prospectively collected results of the first 99 consecutively performed C-TBNA between December 2009 and 2013. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (I): First 33, (II): Next 33 and (III): Last 33. Results were categorized as malignant, non-malignant or non-diagnostic. Diagnostic yield (DY), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy (ACC) were calculated to learn the learning curve for C-TBNA. RESULTS: Total 99 patients (M:F = 62:37), mean age 58.2 +/- 11.5 years, mean LN diameter 26.9 +/- 9.8 mm underwent C-TBNA. Sixty-nine patients had lymph nodes (LNs) >20 mm in diameter. Final diagnoses were established by C-TBNA in 44 (yield 44.4%), mediastinoscopy 47, transthoracic needle aspiration 5, endobronchial biopsy 2 and peripheral LN biopsy 1. C-TBNA was exclusively diagnostic in 35.4%. Group I: DY: 42.4%, 64.7% in malignancies, 19% in benign conditions (P = 0.008). SEN, SPE, PPV, NPV, ACC = 70%, 100%, 100%, 66.6%, 78.7%, respectively. Group II: DY: 54.5% (36.4% exclusive), 88.2% in malignancies and 19% benign conditions (P = 0.000). SEN, SPE, PPV, NPV, ACC=72%, 100%, 100%, 53.3%, 78.7%, respectively. Group III: DY: 36.3% (27% exclusive), 100% in malignancies and 16% in benign conditions. SEN, SPE, PPV, NPV, ACC = 92.3%, 100%, 100%, 95.2%, 97%, respectively. No difference was found in relation to LN size or location and TBNA yield. CONCLUSION: C-TBNA can be easily learned and the proficiency can be attained with <66 procedures. In selected patients, its exclusivity could exceed 35%.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1998-3557en_US
dc.identifier.endpage54en_US
dc.identifier.issn1817-1737en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84919968846en_US
dc.identifier.startpage50en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/11748
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.wos000346909400009en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4103/1817-1737.146873en_US
dc.relation.journalANNALS OF THORACIC MEDICINEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectC-TBNAen_US
dc.subjectEBUS-TBNAen_US
dc.subjectflexible bronchoscopyen_US
dc.subjectlearning curveen_US
dc.titleConventional Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: from Acquisition to Precisionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: