The Role of Analysis of NK Cell Subsets in Peripheral Blood and Uterine Lavage Samples in Evaluation of Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure

dc.contributor.authorTohma, Yusuf Aytac
dc.contributor.authorMusabak, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorGunakan, Emre
dc.contributor.authorAkilli, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorOnalan, Gogsen
dc.contributor.authorZeyneloglu, Hulusi Bulent
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-1511-7634en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-0289-2642en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-8854-8190en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID32413518en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAU-1810-2020en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDB-6487-2009en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDABI-1707-2020en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAX-3230-2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-19T08:39:12Z
dc.date.available2021-04-19T08:39:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this study, we aimed to determine the role of analyses of NK cell subsets in peripheral blood and uterine lavage samples in evaluation of patients with unexplained RIF. Methods: This retrospective single-institution case-control study included two different cohorts between 2017-2019. First cohort included patients examined with peripheral blood samples for evaluation of possible immunologic problems in patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure; in the study period, a total of 75 consecutive patients with RIF (study group; n: 42) or infertile patients without RIF (control group; n: 33) were included. Second cohort included those patients whose uterine samples were assessed for immunologic problems; RIF (study group ; n: 16) or infertile patients without RIF (control group; n: 25). Results: In the first cohort, the percentage of NK cells (CD3-CD16(+)56(+)) is statistically significantly lower (9.8 vs. 12.6, respectively, p: 0.038) in the study group than those of the controls whereas there was no statistical significance in the absolute number of NK cells (CD3-CD16(+)56(+)). In the second cohort, the only remarkable finding in uterine lavage samples was significantly increased uNKs cells (CD3-CD16(di)(m)56(bright)) percentages in controls (9.95 vs 12.7, respectively, p: 0.026) compared to those of study group. Conclusion: Our data shows that the analysis of NK cell subtypes in peripheral blood does not seem appropriate to investigate the patients with RIF and we suggest that uterine lavage samples instead of peripheral blood samples be implemented and evaluated. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2468-7847en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084704357en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5712
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.wos000583846900007en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101793en_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPeripheral blooden_US
dc.subjectuterine lavageen_US
dc.subjectimmunologyen_US
dc.subjectrecurrent implantation failureen_US
dc.titleThe Role of Analysis of NK Cell Subsets in Peripheral Blood and Uterine Lavage Samples in Evaluation of Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failureen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: