Comparison of Sedoanalgesia Versus Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for the Prevention of the Pain During Endovascular Treatment of Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Fistulas

dc.contributor.authorGedikoglu, Murat
dc.contributor.authorAndic, Cagatay
dc.contributor.authorGuzelmansur, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorEker, Hatice Evren
dc.contributor.authorBolgen, Cagatay
dc.contributor.pubmedID31342099en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-15T08:11:22Z
dc.date.available2020-12-15T08:11:22Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractPurpose Although intravenous sedation and analgesia have been widely used as a first choice to relieve pain during treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas by interventional radiology, the sedoanalgesic drugs have a considerable risk of respiratory depression, especially in hemodialysis patients. In this study, we compared the utility and efficiency of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block versus sedoanalgesia for the prevention of pain during endovascular treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas Materials and Methods Patients were randomized into two groups: ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (n = 34) or sedoanalgesia group (n = 34). A visual analogue scale from no pain (= 0) to worst pain possible (= 10) was used to assess the pain intensity. Patient and operator satisfaction were graded from 0 to 2: 0, not satisfied at all; 1, partially satisfied; 2, satisfied (very well or complete satisfaction). Both groups were compared in terms of pain scores, patient and operator satisfaction as well as complications. Results The median pain score was significantly lower in the block group compared to the sedoanalgesia group, 0 (0-4) versus 6 (2-10), p = 0.0001. Patient satisfaction and operator satisfaction were significantly higher in the block group than in the sedoanalgesia group (p = 0.0001). Severe oxygen desaturation occurred in five (14.7%) patients following the administration of sedoanalgesia. No side effects or complications related to block procedure occurred in any patient. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block has advantages over the sedoanalgesia during endovascular treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas. It can provide safe and efficient analgesia with excellent procedural satisfaction in adult hemodialysis patients.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1397en_US
dc.identifier.issn0174-1551en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85069678359en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1391en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5036
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.wos000485032600003en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00270-019-02293-8en_US
dc.relation.journalCARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSupraclavicular brachial plexus blocken_US
dc.subjectUltrasound-guided regional anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectSedoanalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectHemodialysis fistulaen_US
dc.subjectEndovascular treatmenten_US
dc.subjectInterventional radiologyen_US
dc.titleComparison of Sedoanalgesia Versus Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for the Prevention of the Pain During Endovascular Treatment of Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Fistulasen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: