Comparison of Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurements with Two Plasma and Single Plasma Sample Methods in Renal Transplant Cases with Stable Renal Graft Functions

dc.contributor.authorOner, Ali Ozan
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Funda
dc.contributor.authorIpekci, Tumay
dc.contributor.authorSipahi, Murat
dc.contributor.authorSuleymanlar, Gultekin
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Firat
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-2755-0526en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID25643901en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAB-2986-2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-16T06:51:16Z
dc.date.available2024-02-16T06:51:16Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThis study was planned to determine the efficacies of single plasma sample methods (SPSMs) in indicating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by taking two plasma sample method (TPSM) as reference in the determination of the GFR in cases with clinically stable renal transplantation. Ninety-six renal transplantation cases (33 female, 63 male; age interval 18-67, mean age 37.46 +/- A 11.81 years) progressing stably clinically and as laboratory, with minimum 6 months after transplantation were included in the study. The GFR values of the cases were measured with SPSM and TPSM. It is observed that all SPSMs have a strong correlation with TPSM. Highest correlation was observed between Groth&Aasted SPSM and TPSM GFR (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.965). In the analyses performed by using the Bland-Altman analysis, GFR values calculated by all SPSMs were concordant to the TPSM which is the gold standard method in 95 % confidence interval (average +/- A 1.96 standard deviation) and were within the clinically acceptable limits. The narrowest concordance interval was obtained between Groth&Aasted Tc-99 m DTPA SPSM and Tc-99 m DTPA TPSM..Besides, we have obtained the minimum bias and precision value by the Groth&Aasted method. As a result; we can see that all the SPSMs give reliable results in measuring GFR in cases with renal transplantation; besides, we suggest Groth&Aasted method as the first option.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1864-6433en_US
dc.identifier.endpage365en_US
dc.identifier.issn0914-7187en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84939943355en_US
dc.identifier.startpage359en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/11554
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wos000353829400006en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s12149-015-0954-xen_US
dc.relation.journalANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGlomerular filtration rateen_US
dc.subjectRenal transplantationen_US
dc.subjectSingle plasma sample methoden_US
dc.subjectTwo plasma sample methoden_US
dc.titleComparison of Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurements with Two Plasma and Single Plasma Sample Methods in Renal Transplant Cases with Stable Renal Graft Functionsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: