Canaliculitis Awareness
dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz, Melike Balikolglu | |
dc.contributor.author | Sen, Emine | |
dc.contributor.author | Evren, Ebru | |
dc.contributor.author | Elgin, Ufuk | |
dc.contributor.author | Yilmazbas, Pelin | |
dc.contributor.pubmedID | 27800254 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-13T07:56:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-13T07:56:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To evaluate the demographic characteristics, treatment, and results of patients with canaliculitis. Materials and Methods: Medical records including the demographic characteristics, clinical findings, and treatment outcomes of patients diagnosed and treated for canaliculitis between September 2009 and March 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median age of the 7 canaliculitis patients consisting of 4 women and 3 men was 49 (range 8-58) years. All patients had unilateral canaliculitis (on the right side in 2 and left side in 5 patients) and the inferior canaliculus was involved more frequently (71.4%). Epiphora, chronic conjunctivitis, a palpable and thickened canaliculus, and yellow discharge from the punctum were present in all cases. Actinomyces spp. was the most frequently cultured microorganism (75%). Dacryolith was observed in 6 patients. Canaliculotomy and dacryolith removal with canalicular curettage were performed, followed by medical treatment (topical penicillin 100,000 U/ml and oral ampicillin/sulbactam) for 10 days. Patients were followed up for a mean duration of 17.0 +/- 15.2 (range 3-46) months. Signs and symptoms resolved completely within a month. Epiphora recurred in the 36th month in a single patient and was treated with daily canalicular irrigation with antibiotics and there were no further symptoms during 10 months of follow-up after the recurrence. Conclusion: Canaliculitis is often overlooked and can be misdiagnosed. Every patient with chronic conjunctivitis and lacrimal infection should be examined carefully for canaliculitis. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1300-0659 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84958093105 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 25 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cms.galenos.com.tr/Uploads/Article_11634/25-29-ing.pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11727/3902 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 46 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000374665200007 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.4274/tjo.68916 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Canaliculitis | en_US |
dc.subject | canaliculotomy | en_US |
dc.subject | conjunctivitis | en_US |
dc.subject | curettage | en_US |
dc.title | Canaliculitis Awareness | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |