The Diagnostic Value of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1, Compared with Procalcitonin, C-reactive Protein, and Lactate in Bacteremia Estimation for Patients with Febrile Neutropenia

dc.contributor.authorOdemis, Ilker
dc.contributor.authorKose, Sukran
dc.contributor.authorSenger, Suheyla Serin
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Ilkay
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Didem
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-2638-0163en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T06:55:37Z
dc.date.available2021-04-16T06:55:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBacteremia in the febrile neutropenic patients significantly increases the mortality. It takes a long time to complete the blood culture for the diagnosis of bacteremia. Therefore, quick and specific markers are needed for the prediction of bacteremia. The purpose of this study are to compare the diagnostic value of lactate, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels in a patient with febrile neutropenia, and to evaluate its usefulness in predicting bacteremia. This study was designed to be prospective case-control study. Forty-eight patients and forty control cases aged 18 years or older who were monitored between May 2016 and May 2017 were included in the study. P-value as <0.05 was accepted to be significant. Significantly increased values were determined by the level of inflammatory markers of patients compared to the control group. The highest diagnostic odds ratio were found to be in MCP-1. For patients with febrile neutropenia, CRP (83.3%), and MCP-1 (81.2%) were the most sensitive markers while lactate (85.0%), MCP-1 (75%), and procalcitonin (75%) were the most specific markers. CRP was the only beneficial biomarker in the estimation of bacteremia. No significant results were observed for any biomarker for the prediction of the gram positive/negative discrimination of bacteria in the blood culture. We believe that CRP MCP-1, and lactate levels can be taken into consideration for diagnosis, and CRP can be beneficial in the estimation of bacteremia.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage426en_US
dc.identifier.issn1841-6624en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage419en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/rrlm-2020-0036
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5691
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wos000592699700005en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.2478/rrlm-2020-0036en_US
dc.relation.journalREVISTA ROMANA DE MEDICINA DE LABORATORen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbiomarkersen_US
dc.subjectprocalcitoninen_US
dc.subjectbacteremiaen_US
dc.subjectFebrile neutropeniaen_US
dc.subjectmonocyte chemoattractant protein-1en_US
dc.titleThe Diagnostic Value of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1, Compared with Procalcitonin, C-reactive Protein, and Lactate in Bacteremia Estimation for Patients with Febrile Neutropeniaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
10.2478_rrlm-2020-0036.pdf
Size:
378.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: