Efficacy of the Sonoelastography Method for Diagnosis of Fibrosis in Renal Transplant Patients

dc.contributor.authorSoudmand, Arash
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Funda Ulu
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Nihal
dc.contributor.authorHaberal, Nihan
dc.contributor.authorBoyvat, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorMoray, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorHaberal, Mehmet
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-7632en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID29993356en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-8097-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T10:22:19Z
dc.date.available2022-12-14T10:22:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Although biopsy is the most important method for diagnosing the cause of renal allograft dysfunction, sonoelastography, a new ultrasonography method, can be used to distinguish between the soft or hard nature of lesions. In this study, our aim was to investigate whether sonoelastography could diagnose fibrosis in renal transplant patients. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, we included patients over 18 years old who were recommended for clinical biopsy. Sonoelastographic evaluation was made by conducting acoustic radiation force impulse measurements for each patient after they were admitted to the clinic for biopsy. Measurements were performed just before the biopsy procedure. All results were examined by 2 experienced radiologists using the Siemens S3000 Ultrasound Machine (Erlangen, Germany). Comparisons of ultrasonographic values with biopsy results were made with SPSS software (SPSS: An IBM Company, version 20, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Results: Of the 65 patients included in this study, pathology showed acute T-cell-mediated rejection in 37 patients. There was a significant correlation between the pathologic Banff scores and the sonographic acoustic radiation force impulse values (P = .002), where the degree of Banff increased as the mean acoustic radiation force impulse values elevated. A rise in mean impulse values correlated with increased degree of interstitial fibrosis in renal allografts. Renal parenchymal echogenicity of patients significantly differed by sex (P = .009), with an average renal echogenicity of grade 1 in women and grade 0 in men. Also, a statistically significant difference was found between age of the renal transplant recipient and resistive index values. Conclusions: Our study showed a significant correlation between Banff degree and the acoustic radiation force impulse values of renal transplant patients. In addition to biopsy, sonoelastography can be beneficial for the diagnosis of fibrosis in renal transplant patients.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage479en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0855en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85131384020en_US
dc.identifier.startpage472en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/8291
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.wos000805861700004en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.6002/ect.2017.0238en_US
dc.relation.journalEXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAllograft biopsyen_US
dc.subjectKidney transplanten_US
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of the Sonoelastography Method for Diagnosis of Fibrosis in Renal Transplant Patientsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: