Lacrimal dilator-facilitated incisionless vs. standard sub-Tenon's block: a randomized, prospective and non-inferiority comparative study

dc.contributor.authorCoban-Karatas, Muge
dc.contributor.authorCok, Oya Yalcin
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Chandra M
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-3004-2626en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID33005046en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAI-7998-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T07:36:27Z
dc.date.available2021-04-29T07:36:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground/objectives Standard sub-Tenon's block (STB) involves incision (dissection) of conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule with the help of blunt scissors and forceps, insertion of a blunt sub-Tenon's cannula under the Tenon's capsule and injection of local anaesthetic agent. STB is frequently associated with minor complications such as chemosis and postoperative subconjunctival haemorrhage but rare sight and life-threatening complications. To reduce these minor complications, several variations of incisionless STB have been described however, there are no comparative data. One such incisionless STB involves the use of lacrimal dilator which is easily available in the operating theatre. We compared incisionless lacrimal dilator-facilitated with the standard STB for effectiveness, chemosis, and postoperative subconjunctival haemorrhage. Subjects/methods After obtaining ethical approval, patients scheduled to undergo elective phacoemulsification cataract surgery were enroled to receive incisionless lacrimal dilator-facilitated STB (Group LD) or a standard STB using Wescott scissors and blunt forceps (Group WS). All patients received 3 mL 2% lidocaine without any adjuvant. No sedation was administered. Demographics of the patients, duration of the procedure, analgesia, akinesia, duration of the procedure intraoperative chemosis, and postoperative subconjunctival haemorrhage were compared. Results Both groups were comparable for demographic data, duration of the procedure, analgesia, and akinesia (p > 0.05). The severity of chemosis and postoperative subconjunctival haemorrhage were significantly lower in Group LD (n = 32) in comparison to Group WS (n = 31) (p < 0.001). Conclusions Incisionless lacrimal dilator-facilitated STB decreases intraoperative chemosis and postoperative conjunctival haemorrhage in comparison to standard STB. Analgesia and akinesia are comparable in both techniques.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0950-222Xen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091803206en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/5812
dc.identifier.wos000574317800003en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1038/s41433-020-01207-0en_US
dc.relation.journalEYEen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOPHTHALMIC REGIONAL ANESTHESIAen_US
dc.subjectREFRACTIVE SURGERYen_US
dc.subjectCATARACTen_US
dc.subjectCOMPLICATIONSen_US
dc.subjectCANNULAen_US
dc.subjectPREFERENCESen_US
dc.subjectTRENDSen_US
dc.titleLacrimal dilator-facilitated incisionless vs. standard sub-Tenon's block: a randomized, prospective and non-inferiority comparative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: