Uterine Perforation During 3-Dimensional Image-Guided Brachytherapy in Patients With Cervical Cancer Baskent University Experience

dc.contributor.authorOnal, Cem
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Ozan Cem
dc.contributor.authorDolek, Yemliha
dc.contributor.authorErbay, Gurcan
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-9021en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-3412en_US
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-8680en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID24407583en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDHOC-5611-2023en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAC-5654-2020en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAK-5370-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T09:02:21Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T09:02:21Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractObjectives This study aimed to determine the incidence and characteristics of uterine perforation at our department using 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT)-based brachytherapy (BRT). The characteristics of the patients presenting with perforation and impact of the perforation on the treatment course were also analyzed. Materials and Methods The clinical and radiologic data of 200 patients with biopsy-proven cervical cancer treated using CT-based BRT were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had undergone tandem-based intracavitary BRT, and 67 patients had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before BRT. Results Of the 200 patients, 17 (8.5%) had uterine perforation. Of the 626 applications with CT images, 30 (4.8%) resulted in uterine perforation. The median age of patients with perforation was higher (68 years; range, 44-89 years) than that of the patients without perforation (59 years; range, 21-87 years), and the mean (SD) tumor size at diagnosis was larger in patients with perforation (7.0 [1.5] cm) than in patients without perforation (5.0 [1.5] cm). The most frequent perforation site was the posterior uterine wall (8 patients), followed by the fundus (5 patients) and anterior wall (4 patients). Of the 7 patients with a retroverted uterus, 4 had uterine perforation during BRT. In 67 patients with MRI delivered before BRT, only 3 (4%) had uterine perforation, and 2 of the 3 patients with uterine perforation had a retroverted uterus. However, of the 133 patients with no MRI evaluation before BRT, 14 (11%) had uterine perforation. No life-threatening complications or signs of intraperitoneal tumor cell seeding were observed. Conclusions Older age, larger tumors, a retroverted uterus, and a stenotic cervical os were all predisposing factors for uterine perforation during BRT. Preoperative MRI is a feasible and safe method to decrease the risks of uterine perforation and could be used preoperatively in centers where intraoperative ultrasonography is not used in routine practice.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage351en_US
dc.identifier.issn1048-891Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84893802284en_US
dc.identifier.startpage346en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/11583
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wos000336489200025en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/IGC.0000000000000048en_US
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCERen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCervical canceren_US
dc.subjectBrachytherapyen_US
dc.subjectUterine perforationen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.titleUterine Perforation During 3-Dimensional Image-Guided Brachytherapy in Patients With Cervical Cancer Baskent University Experienceen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: