Is Colposcopic Evaluation Necessary in All Women with Postcoital Bleeding?

dc.contributor.authorGulumser, Cagri
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Aykut
dc.contributor.authorKuscu, Esra
dc.contributor.authorAyhan, Ali
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-5434-1025en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-0992-6980en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID26254856en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDK-1760-2018en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-5802-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAI-8792-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T11:59:59Z
dc.date.available2023-12-21T11:59:59Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate what extent postcoital bleeding (PCB) is an indicator of cervical cancer (CIN2 (+)). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Between 2007 and 2013, amongst all referred patients, a total of 1491 consecutive women who had both conventional cytology and cervical biopsy were enrolled in the study. Of those 237 women have PCB, according to biopsy results, subjects were divided into two groups: CIN1 (-) and CIN2 (+). Multiple logistic regressions was used to construct a model to predict the occurrence of CIN 2 (+) based on age, menopause, marriage status, smoking, PCB, HPV and cytology. Results: Among the all women with CIN 2 (+) colposcopy guided biopsy result, PCB was 13.1% (53/406). The relationship between biopsy results and age, parity, menopausal status, marital status, smoking, presence of PCB, HPV DNA, and cytology is statistically significant (p = 0.012, p = 0.001, p = 0.023, 0.013, p > 0.001, p = 0.038, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). According to regression analysis only smoking, HPV (+) and abnormal cytology increase the probability of CIN2 (+); 1.687 times (p = 0.018), 4.065 times (p < 0.001), 5.787 times (p = 0.001) respectively. Having PCB only does not indicate an increased risk of CIN2 (+). Conclusion: Colposcopic examination and biopsy should be performed only in the situation where women have PCB and any of the following: smoking, positive HPV, or abnormal cytology. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1872-7654en_US
dc.identifier.endpage87en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-2115en_US
dc.identifier.startpage83en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/11161
dc.identifier.volume193en_US
dc.identifier.wos000361777400016en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.012en_US
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPostcoital bleedingen_US
dc.subjectCervical canceren_US
dc.subjectColposcopyen_US
dc.subjectSmearen_US
dc.subjectHPVen_US
dc.subjectCytologyen_US
dc.titleIs Colposcopic Evaluation Necessary in All Women with Postcoital Bleeding?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: