Evaluation of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Elderly Patients with Pharyngeal Aberrant Internal Carotid Artery Using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10)

dc.contributor.authorJafarov, Sabuhi
dc.contributor.authorIsazade, Artoghrul
dc.contributor.authorKoycu, Alper
dc.contributor.authorBeyazpinar, Gulfem
dc.contributor.authorBahcecitapar, Melike
dc.contributor.authorTuzuner, Arzu
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-9735-3504en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-8467-0225en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-1290-3509en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-9735-3504en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID34226957en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAI-8044-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-1829-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAF-3650-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAJ-2487-2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T10:22:42Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T10:22:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPharyngeal aberrant internal carotid artery (PAICA) has been reported to be a cause of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in case reports. However, as there have been no clinical studies, the relationship between PAICA and OD is not clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the perception of OD in elderly PAICA patients using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10). A study group (Group 1) was formed of patients diagnosed with PAICA from the visualization of a pulsatile mass in the pharynx in flexible fiberoptic endoscopic examination and carotid magnetic resonance angiography tests, and a control group (Group 2) was formed of age-matched healthy volunteers. The study group was subdivided as patients with unilateral PAICA (Group 1a) and patients with bilateral PAICA (Group 1b). The Turkish version of the EAT-10 was applied to all the participants. Total EAT-10 points of >= 3 were accepted as abnormal. Normal (< 3) and abnormal (>= 3) total EAT-10 points were determined in 88.9% (24/27) and 11.1% (3/27), respectively, of the control group, in 55.2% (16/29) and 44.8% (13/29) of Group 1, in 70.6% (12/17) and 29.4% (5/17) of Group 1a, and in 33.3% (4/12) and 66.7% (8/12) of Group 1b. A statistically significant difference was determined between the control group and Group 1 and Group 1b in respect of abnormal (>= 3) EAT-10 total points (p = 0.007, p = 0.001, respectively). No statistically significant difference was determined between the control group and Group 1a (p = 0.227). Problems (EAT point >= 1) in item 4 (swallowing solids takes extra effort) were experienced by 13 (44.8%) patients in Group 1, 9 (75%) patients in Group 1b, and 5 (18.5%) subjects in the control group (p < 0.05). These results demonstrated that unilateral PAICA does not significantly affect swallowing, whereas bilateral PAICA created a significant negative effect. These patients experience more problems when swallowing solid food.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage682en_US
dc.identifier.issn0179-051Xen_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85109082103en_US
dc.identifier.startpage676en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00455-021-10318-z.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/7532
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wos000669788200001en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00455-021-10318-zen_US
dc.relation.journalDYSPHAGIAen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOropharyngeal dysphagiaen_US
dc.subjectAberrant internal carotid arteryen_US
dc.subjectElderly patientsen_US
dc.subjectEating Assessment Tool-10en_US
dc.subjectDeglutitionen_US
dc.subjectDeglutition disordersen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Elderly Patients with Pharyngeal Aberrant Internal Carotid Artery Using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: